Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1TNWH1-0005kv-Mm for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 14 Oct 2012 22:03:03 +0000 X-ACL-Warn: Received: from zinan.dashjr.org ([173.242.112.54]) by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) id 1TNWH0-0008PQ-Ro for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 14 Oct 2012 22:03:03 +0000 Received: from ishibashi.localnet (unknown [173.170.188.216]) (Authenticated sender: luke-jr) by zinan.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9895A27A296B; Sun, 14 Oct 2012 22:02:56 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke-Jr" To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2012 22:02:45 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.5.4-gentoo; KDE/4.8.5; x86_64; ; ) References: In-Reply-To: X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: E463 A93F 5F31 17EE DE6C 7316 BD02 9424 21F4 889F X-PGP-Key-ID: BD02942421F4889F X-PGP-Keyserver: hkp://pgp.mit.edu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201210142202.47221.luke@dashjr.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.4 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -0.4 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Headers-End: 1TNWH0-0008PQ-Ro Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Hosting of compiled bitcoin client X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2012 22:03:03 -0000 On Sunday, October 14, 2012 8:52:33 PM Kyle Henderson wrote: > Given that sourceforge has shown to restrict access to a number of > countries at the request of the USA This needs some clarification. If the USA has "requested" it, then presumably there's some legality involved, and our US developers shouldn't be made liable for it. The specific reason SourceForge has restricted access should be made known so non-US developers (or gitian builders) can evaluate their own laws and hopefully at least one will be in a jurisdiction that allows it. But GitHub is also US-located, so hosting it there may be a problem too. Luke