Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1SF8tg-0004vJ-5V for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 03 Apr 2012 18:56:04 +0000 X-ACL-Warn: Received: from zinan.dashjr.org ([173.242.112.54]) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) id 1SF8tZ-0007Zu-Kn for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 03 Apr 2012 18:56:04 +0000 Received: from ishibashi.localnet (unknown [97.96.85.141]) (Authenticated sender: luke-jr) by zinan.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 73DAF5606E6; Tue, 3 Apr 2012 18:55:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke-Jr" To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 14:55:40 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.2.2-gentoo; KDE/4.7.4; x86_64; ; ) References: <4F7A1227.7070306@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: E463 A93F 5F31 17EE DE6C 7316 BD02 9424 21F4 889F X-PGP-Key-ID: BD02942421F4889F X-PGP-Keyserver: hkp://pgp.mit.edu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201204031455.42265.luke@dashjr.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Headers-End: 1SF8tZ-0007Zu-Kn Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Signature Blocks and URI Sign Requests X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2012 18:56:04 -0000 On Tuesday, April 03, 2012 2:46:17 PM Gavin Andresen wrote: > We should avoid reinventing the wheel, if we can. I think we should > extend existing standards whenever possible. I wonder if it's possible to make sigs compatible with PGP/EC ?