Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1WHyCs-0006sK-KQ for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 16:16:38 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.223.172 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.223.172; envelope-from=pieter.wuille@gmail.com; helo=mail-ie0-f172.google.com; Received: from mail-ie0-f172.google.com ([209.85.223.172]) by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1WHyCr-0003oy-Ut for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 16:16:38 +0000 Received: by mail-ie0-f172.google.com with SMTP id rd18so3681455iec.3 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 08:16:32 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.42.97.193 with SMTP id p1mr15060587icn.32.1393258592556; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 08:16:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.50.29.42 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 08:16:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 17:16:32 +0100 Message-ID: From: Pieter Wuille To: Jeff Garzik Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (pieter.wuille[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1WHyCr-0003oy-Ut Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] On OP_RETURN in upcoming 0.9 release X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 16:16:38 -0000 On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 5:03 PM, Jeff Garzik wrote: > I do think > regular transactions should have the ability to include some metadata. and > 2) Endorsement of chain data storage. > > Nothing could be further from the truth. These two statements are in direct contradiction with each other. -- Pieter