Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B490C10DE for ; Mon, 5 Oct 2015 12:33:02 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from server3 (server3.include7.ch [144.76.194.38]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3CAA209 for ; Mon, 5 Oct 2015 12:33:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by server3 (Postfix, from userid 115) id B49C62D007E1; Mon, 5 Oct 2015 14:33:00 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_1 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from Jonass-MacBook-Pro.local (cable-static-140-182.teleport.ch [87.102.140.182]) by server3 (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 086912D002A3; Mon, 5 Oct 2015 14:32:59 +0200 (CEST) To: Jean-Pierre Rupp , Matias Alejo Garcia , Thomas Kerin References: <560FCD30.9020902@haskoin.com> <5611432F.5070209@haskoin.com> <561160EB.30505@gmail.com> <56126AB0.3030107@haskoin.com> From: Jonas Schnelli X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <56126DF8.20602@jonasschnelli.ch> Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 14:32:56 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56126AB0.3030107@haskoin.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Bitcoin-development] New BIP32 structure for P2SH multisig wallets [BIP-45] X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2015 12:33:02 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > Perhaps Pedro wants to also participate in a 2-of-2 cosigning > arrangement with a merchant that will deliver a laptop to him, so > Pedro provides this merchant with the same extended public key > derived from path m/45', and the merchant provides Pedro with his > own: What holds you back from using m/i'/45' where i' is your multisig "account" number? Within your BIP45 wallet (lets assume Copay), you would not provide the xpubkey at m/45', instead you would provide your xpubkey at m/i'/45' . It's probably no longer pure BIP45. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJWEm34AAoJECnUvLZBb1Ps+TgP/RmIxp31GOF9JDYVvSpaWfjf NhB7o5/AiQ5rNv2BL5Wdoebb3EHzPTjzf/gGq3vSHQkm+c5rnDO8kTtwlNog7HN3 djtlbdhftlqcWdgBYNRstMj52NlfQKz4exvaPTsFlxUS02VzafPhssde9H7KdBHw HoePJziOku6ibHW3u2CdEtGHYSRZ0w7xUmGYUjYc9LRa86Gl5aHFOzTVmboQgNW+ MACb30gSjMGP6i4iHsuwYMpc7DJ1SyooqAL64Z+YN/ZJayHatJIxVx8GGPC2HW5g nj1LuJacK5VA2VtqtnRhVP0IEm4rKSgSzJz/534lB8/6RFejR0VnjzLZcMsa2TcQ 7yWf6xAN3ijMWi8mxG2RL/2xZiH3txpdMLme3e5YyZ8sgDw04zJI8lKRkg8kN8Wo G8JQ/6hAzK9OhceoCnazE1ODXRiKa/jXvtfdiuzAb7Q3zFbnXNT2b7dshU0eY6iW GWBmOInBROfoAqt43gQIMC0gpBsQc9JlVN5s6CgPxhEAMsZI/akKm4qufGbvb767 USgzh6UPE+secLkgjZC/lVKmk7rD+7poJjZB5XzaGdKAxzpFTqw/gLXhfG17TVPA ZwA2UFhnHVitP839RenrCxWORng2F8gDO/ElWTWtwCq7+c2UxEOxSiKfTOahEoFw LmOUFxn5iMSbdBEbkm54 =cbgc -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----