Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <gmaxwell@gmail.com>) id 1YIT7K-0003HA-BF
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Tue, 03 Feb 2015 02:21:30 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.213.180 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.213.180; envelope-from=gmaxwell@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-ig0-f180.google.com; 
Received: from mail-ig0-f180.google.com ([209.85.213.180])
	by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1YIT7J-0003Vp-KL
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Tue, 03 Feb 2015 02:21:30 +0000
Received: by mail-ig0-f180.google.com with SMTP id b16so21462943igk.1
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Mon, 02 Feb 2015 18:21:24 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.143.38 with SMTP id sb6mr15455342igb.40.1422930084351;
	Mon, 02 Feb 2015 18:21:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.107.6.18 with HTTP; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 18:21:24 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAPg+sBjjYLf4NZ8ezK7ML_OO-e6C8_V1i12AXejjrgp+wFB-pg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPg+sBhk7F2OHT64i2LNSjv8DR5tD3RJkLJGzPGZW8OPQTCjQw@mail.gmail.com>
	<87egqnwt7g.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
	<CAPg+sBjQAi_hCcoV0gecVQAd4PYKzRd5F_nymz8UVt9BFg8O2Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAS2fgQjTq1M6fF5KDiZ-qBrCWjs9z5VKtj-c1ghRfDeK6iyPA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPg+sBjjYLf4NZ8ezK7ML_OO-e6C8_V1i12AXejjrgp+wFB-pg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2015 02:21:24 +0000
Message-ID: <CAAS2fgQKbsaU5f+UPp8z2nEgXOfNhsFJoY=2j76ArXnBRsiV6g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
To: Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(gmaxwell[at]gmail.com)
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
	author's domain
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1YIT7J-0003Vp-KL
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] [softfork proposal] Strict DER signatures
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 02:21:30 -0000

On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 12:44 AM, Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com> wrote:
> The much simpler alternative is just adding this to BIP66's DERSIG
> right now, which is a one-line change that's obviously softforking. Is
> anyone opposed to doing so at this stage?

Thats my preference.