Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.214.169 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.214.169; envelope-from=kanzure@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-ob0-f169.google.com; 
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CADK=3HwNp9bMtpviZK0cyYc+UTEvm5589Obe5of7VbMZ06dJ4g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALqxMTHeipZZrJ_NSXK9vxiO83gSDgM6TA7T7XNBS3LtmuK2KA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADK=3HwNp9bMtpviZK0cyYc+UTEvm5589Obe5of7VbMZ06dJ4g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 17:35:38 -0500
Message-ID: <CABaSBawmfP0m98jM_5qyHEoJmVK_UeBsc=Odf5QMb0Nw-pAp3Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Bryan Bishop <kanzure@gmail.com>
To: Daniel Murrell <dsmurrell@gmail.com>, Bryan Bishop <kanzure@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: Bitcoin-Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] side-chains & 2-way pegging (Re: is there
 a way to do bitcoin-staging?)
Precedence: list

On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Daniel Murrell <dsmurrell@gmail.com> wrote:
> p.s. I'm not trying to monetize this site. I just tried to make
> something I thought could be useful.

[Unsolicited administrivia follows.]

You have been posting this in a bunch of places for a while now, at
least three times today by my count on other mediums. I also observed
negative karma scores associated with these posts. Maybe you could
consider toning down the message frequency? I think by now everyone
knows you want them to use your site. I also think that in the limit
that it would be inappropriate for /everyone/ to post all possible
research sites, or even vaguely topical discussion sites, for every
paper posted. Personally, I would much rather have discussions happen
on the mailing list anyway, although if I had a different opinion I
certainly hope I would still send this message.

Thank you.

- Bryan
http://heybryan.org/
1 512 203 0507