Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from <etotheipi@gmail.com>) id 1ROXDs-0000JT-Oz for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 16:11:28 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.212.47 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.212.47; envelope-from=etotheipi@gmail.com; helo=mail-vw0-f47.google.com; Received: from mail-vw0-f47.google.com ([209.85.212.47]) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1ROXDn-0004QX-GH for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 16:11:28 +0000 Received: by vwe42 with SMTP id 42so3364341vwe.34 for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 08:11:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.52.24.11 with SMTP id q11mr13783286vdf.83.1320941476801; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 08:11:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.85] (c-76-111-108-35.hsd1.md.comcast.net. [76.111.108.35]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ey9sm12732723vdc.19.2011.11.10.08.11.14 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 10 Nov 2011 08:11:16 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4EBBF7A7.8030708@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 11:11:19 -0500 From: Alan Reiner <etotheipi@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.23) Gecko/20110921 Thunderbird/3.1.15 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------040906040300090304080306" X-Spam-Score: -0.8 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (etotheipi[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature -0.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-Headers-End: 1ROXDn-0004QX-GH Subject: [Bitcoin-development] Wallet encryption issue X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development> List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net> List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 16:11:28 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------040906040300090304080306 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sorry guys, I just realized I should've posted this to the dev list first, before/instead of putting it on the forums. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=51474 *I still have some of my private keys in plaintext. *I would guess that BSDDB sometimes will "overwrite" data by just discarding a pointer to the old data, and writing the replacement to a new location within the file. In that case, examining the file with a BSDDB library tool is not going to find this problem. You'll have to examine the raw binary file as I did. Instructions for verifying this problem are in the post. Can someone please verify that this is a real problem? (and should we maybe remove my post until there's a remediation plan? This is problem the best kind of problem to disclose after it's fixed) -Alan --------------040906040300090304080306 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"> </head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> Sorry guys, I just realized I should've posted this to the dev list first, before/instead of putting it on the forums. <br> <br> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=51474">https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=51474</a><br> <br> <b>I still have some of my private keys in plaintext. </b>I would guess that BSDDB sometimes will "overwrite" data by just discarding a pointer to the old data, and writing the replacement to a new location within the file. In that case, examining the file with a BSDDB library tool is not going to find this problem. You'll have to examine the raw binary file as I did. Instructions for verifying this problem are in the post.<br> <br> Can someone please verify that this is a real problem? (and should we maybe remove my post until there's a remediation plan? This is problem the best kind of problem to disclose after it's fixed)<br> -Alan<br> <br> <br> </body> </html> --------------040906040300090304080306--