Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42022BD7 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 12:33:42 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-la0-f49.google.com (mail-la0-f49.google.com [209.85.215.49]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57D91ED for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 12:33:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by laar3 with SMTP id r3so60163925laa.0 for ; Thu, 02 Jul 2015 05:33:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc :content-type; bh=Xh2oKqyQgJDO9dDWODehWJBH9Ht0Pm0DftXunG4M3pI=; b=VZxFEGUWLJcJiIpMMo/N2lJyWfb+58nYk2YRAsIjhWOlIEewJ+yERxJGJBjzRUROzs nuqNlSTtXSEDItq9j9Hl3TwSQ9ebifj2IdV4JQHudjjMMgEHwtzs0f6iQswfOirUh4Ky TLBJsS5jK5HoIyXZEQjcFv3txM/aPd06riK11urp53N3ppxE45mIzpSgZJ/ECjmILT1h HCG8T82XS561xgsLoeiiMgVgYrLq1Jx9dgnyc+V9dTzMJLjWYXksvZT4we7z8JE/z04K oDrO3KKKfwLqfkG0qaL9MlY9IBQgEZ1HsmK66ehGVmJbkt7AO15B6jvelpwp7QXUZRrM KRoA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.28.194 with SMTP id d2mr30805410lah.122.1435840419724; Thu, 02 Jul 2015 05:33:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.25.2.86 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 05:33:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2015 14:33:39 +0200 Message-ID: From: Mistr Bigs Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0160b4202c05380519e3a61d X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE, MISSING_HEADERS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Defining a min spec X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2015 12:33:42 -0000 --089e0160b4202c05380519e3a61d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I'm an end user running a full node on an aging laptop. I think this is a great suggestion! I'd love to know what system requirements are needed for running Bitcoin Core. On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 6:04 AM, Jean-Paul Kogelman wrote: > I=E2=80=99m a game developer. I write time critical code for a living and= have to > deal with memory, CPU, GPU and I/O budgets on a daily basis. These budget= s > are based on what we call a minimum specification (of hardware); min spec > for short. In most cases the min spec is based on entry model machines th= at > are available during launch, and will give the user an enjoyable experien= ce > when playing our games. Obviously, we can turn on a number of bells and > whistles for people with faster machines, but that=E2=80=99s not the poin= t of this > mail. > > The point is, can we define a min spec for Bitcoin Core? The number one > reason for this is: if you know how your changes affect your available > budgets, then the risk of breaking something due to capacity problems is > reduced to practically zero. > > --089e0160b4202c05380519e3a61d Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I'm an end user running a full node on an aging l= aptop.
I think this is a great suggestion! I'd love to know wh= at system requirements are needed for running Bitcoin Core.

On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 6:04= AM, Jean-Paul Kogelman <jeanpaulkogelman@me.com> wrot= e:
I=E2=80=99m a game developer. I write time critical code for a living and h= ave to deal with memory, CPU, GPU and I/O budgets on a daily basis. These b= udgets are based on what we call a minimum specification (of hardware); min= spec for short. In most cases the min spec is based on entry model machine= s that are available during launch, and will give the user an enjoyable exp= erience when playing our games. Obviously, we can turn on a number of bells= and whistles for people with faster machines, but that=E2=80=99s not the p= oint of this mail.

The point is, can we define a min spec for Bitcoin Core? The number one rea= son for this is: if you know how your changes affect your available budgets= , then the risk of breaking something due to capacity problems is reduced t= o practically zero.

--089e0160b4202c05380519e3a61d--