Return-Path: Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::137]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B674C002D for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2022 23:07:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E33E4179C for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2022 23:07:19 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.101 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.101 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: smtp4.osuosl.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=protonmail.com Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rYFWjH4LPADF for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2022 23:07:18 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 Received: from mail-4316.protonmail.ch (mail-4316.protonmail.ch [185.70.43.16]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 314D94176F for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2022 23:07:18 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2022 23:07:08 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1655075236; x=1655334436; bh=4uj4urNTiMADn1aZwyFFSppt4s9OAPAEX+Imlicml5Q=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To: References:Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To: Feedback-ID:Message-ID; b=PdQHJxF1F2akBUz8zpSnQBEiKa8qhOJn5qDQ3bxNiIqqYVN3cTKjHU+2vDHlQc+fn wnFM5ZAzgrFVFRbDkuvL0JiWBvOcftmfxxCeONTZ5Ri8oDLcrHMlWLiNYNeYs2N9j2 mAzBdyEIO4kMcKTLH/rmpi1ybK+2ZEDmr2/xZCZEMPv5X0E1xwWGyUapUTPT2Hk9LQ blEQD6edxnq6YzGMENU9ySGt7pIgVZ0JS4VQaZDGuDr11rr4uVxPYnsXuHuw2oI6z+ lMOSzOM8OcmRSyCRP9oq2X20McnpIfTPNksVmiwSjAaZ4sUqDDNLkR8KSau4dpyNPA G2Hp5C+manzkQ== To: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion From: AdamISZ Reply-To: AdamISZ Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: <46175970-d2ab-a58e-7010-f29820849604@gmail.com> <7c4395b0-9bc9-78e6-5a46-dc3eddb8e97f@gmail.com> Feedback-ID: 11565511:user:proton MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 12 Jun 2022 23:12:12 +0000 Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] MuSig2 BIP X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2022 23:07:19 -0000 Sent with Proton Mail secure email. ------- Original Message ------- On Thursday, May 26th, 2022 at 12:34, AdamISZ via bitcoin-dev wrote: > Hi Jonas, list, > responses inline > > > > > [0] https://github.com/jonasnick/bips/pull/25 > > > Right, thanks, will follow up. > Just to drop a note to the thread that as per the contents of that now merg= ed PR, I'm much more comfortable with the contents of the draft on that sti= cky point re: pubkeys being repeated (and the peripheral points that got ra= ised in that PR discussion). Thanks, waxwing/AdamISZ