MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAMZUoK=pkZuovtifBzdqhoyegzG+9hRTFEc7fG9nZPDK4KbU3w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAD5xwhhwqJ_AETAb3p_zUZmRX-Dzh8J9G984zwEs=KFsGN8aNQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMZUoKmU1cwUAQaBv5m8oo8H3TWBvgsZ_OkQaMC0n0+3cpFtWg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPfvXfLr4n6RsS6VbEZR59=MRwAx41Crx88ko8-qnRXW4nFYGA@mail.gmail.com>
 <XvyRH0U3-np2xDZhhaIgYDXFcTvAnLkP5n-7c58f1bMuh6jAvlF_22n2yquiyoFXYl0s7zQm_3zp46Fzn_tJkxN2Lsz6N75lJmqAS2rlCa4=@protonmail.com>
 <20220128141740.GA3331@erisian.com.au>
In-Reply-To: <20220128141740.GA3331@erisian.com.au>
From: Jeremy <jlrubin@mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2022 08:38:58 -0800
Message-ID: <CAD5xwhhk5iXQrbk7o22JQNxiS9e22NDDYmSctMPL4j3jYcnn2g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Anthony Towns <aj@erisian.com.au>,
 Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f8bb4205d6a71253"
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] TXHASH + CHECKSIGFROMSTACKVERIFY in lieu of CTV
	and ANYPREVOUT
Precedence: list

--000000000000f8bb4205d6a71253
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

I probably need to reset it -- I ran into some issues with the IBD latch
bug IIRC and had difficulty producing new blocks.

I sent funds as a manual faucet to at least one person... not aware of
anyone else finding use for the signet. In part this is due to the fact
that in order to run a signet, you also kind of need to run some kind of
faucet on it, which wasn't readily available when I launched it previously.
I think I can use https://github.com/jsarenik/bitcoin-faucet-shell now
though.

Usually people are using Regtest to play around with CTV less so Signet.
There is value in a signet, but I don't think that "there's not a signet
for it" is a blocking issue v.s. nice to have.
--
@JeremyRubin <https://twitter.com/JeremyRubin>
<https://twitter.com/JeremyRubin>


On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 6:18 AM Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 01:14:07PM +0000, Michael Folkson via bitcoin-dev
> wrote:
> > There is not even a custom signet with CTV (as far as I know)
>
> https://twitter.com/jeremyrubin/status/1339699281192656897
>
>
> signetchallenge=512102946e8ba8eca597194e7ed90377d9bbebc5d17a9609ab3e35e706612ee882759351ae
> addnode=50.18.75.225
>
> But I think there's only been a single coinbase consolidation tx, and no
> actual CTV transactions?
>
> Cheers,
> aj
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>

--000000000000f8bb4205d6a71253
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_default" style=3D"font-family:arial,he=
lvetica,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:#000000">I probably need to reset =
it -- I ran into some issues with the IBD latch bug IIRC and had difficulty=
 producing new blocks.</div><div class=3D"gmail_default" style=3D"font-fami=
ly:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:#000000"><br></div><div=
 class=3D"gmail_default" style=3D"font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;fo=
nt-size:small;color:#000000">I sent funds as a manual faucet to at least on=
e person... not aware of anyone else finding use for the signet. In part th=
is is due to the fact that in order to run a signet, you also kind of need =
to run some kind of faucet on it, which wasn&#39;t readily available when I=
 launched it previously. I think I can use=C2=A0<a href=3D"https://github.c=
om/jsarenik/bitcoin-faucet-shell">https://github.com/jsarenik/bitcoin-fauce=
t-shell</a> now though.</div><div class=3D"gmail_default" style=3D"font-fam=
ily:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:#000000"><br></div><di=
v class=3D"gmail_default" style=3D"font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;f=
ont-size:small;color:#000000">Usually people are using Regtest to play arou=
nd with CTV less so Signet. There is value in a signet, but I don&#39;t thi=
nk that &quot;there&#39;s not a signet for it&quot; is a blocking issue v.s=
. nice to have.</div><div><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_signature" data-s=
martmail=3D"gmail_signature"><div dir=3D"ltr">--<br><a href=3D"https://twit=
ter.com/JeremyRubin" target=3D"_blank">@JeremyRubin</a><a href=3D"https://t=
witter.com/JeremyRubin" target=3D"_blank"></a></div></div></div><br></div><=
br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Fri,=
 Jan 28, 2022 at 6:18 AM Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev &lt;<a href=3D"mailt=
o:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.=
org</a>&gt; wrote:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"marg=
in:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;border-l=
eft-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 01:14:=
07PM +0000, Michael Folkson via bitcoin-dev wrote:<br>
&gt; There is not even a custom signet with CTV (as far as I know) <br>
<br>
<a href=3D"https://twitter.com/jeremyrubin/status/1339699281192656897" rel=
=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://twitter.com/jeremyrubin/status/13=
39699281192656897</a><br>
<br>
signetchallenge=3D512102946e8ba8eca597194e7ed90377d9bbebc5d17a9609ab3e35e70=
6612ee882759351ae<br>
addnode=3D50.18.75.225<br>
<br>
But I think there&#39;s only been a single coinbase consolidation tx, and n=
o<br>
actual CTV transactions?<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
aj<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
bitcoin-dev mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_blank">=
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev" =
rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mail=
man/listinfo/bitcoin-dev</a><br>
</blockquote></div>

--000000000000f8bb4205d6a71253--