MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CABm2gDqGqPEpJYVmZpnwSS3WOmZat8w5xAONLED+C9+VBuQ8_w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPg+sBj-wA1DMrwkQRWnzQoB5NR-q=2-5=WDAAUYfSpXRZSTqw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABm2gDrHjfkC+whh3Vh2LZNdSR1WSAXpNitR-jEdxtbKj7J25g@mail.gmail.com>
	<55BA5283.2000405@mail.bihthai.net>
	<CABm2gDqGqPEpJYVmZpnwSS3WOmZat8w5xAONLED+C9+VBuQ8_w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 20:00:21 +0200
Message-ID: <CABm2gDr8A6dM_OK-CmMLqN7jUBAcm1UFEpQ7KybcXEbdi6Xpdw@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9yZ2UgVGltw7Nu?= <jtimon@jtimon.cc>
To: venzen@mail.bihthai.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Block size following technological growth
Precedence: list

Gavin, Pieter, Mark, Gary, can we move the median time discussion to
its own thread?
http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-July/009731.htm=
l

I really don't want to fill this thread with that discussion.

On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 7:51 PM, Jorge Tim=C3=B3n <jtimon@jtimon.cc> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 6:36 PM, Venzen Khaosan <venzen@mail.bihthai.net>=
 wrote:
>> I just had a look your existing Size N testnet code
>> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6382
>> and i'll set up a node over the weekend and post its address in that
>> PR's conversation. Do you or anyone else already have a node running?
>> what blocksize?
>
> Great! No, I'm not running any node right now at any size.
> Take into account that it's not a regular testnet (ie like testnet3),
> it's a regtest-like testnet to make mining and simulations cheap.
> That also means that anybody can trivially create reorgs, so it is
> expected to be used in a controlled environment (you can control which
> node creates a new block and when).