From: Tom Zander <tomz@freedommail.ch>
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 18:38:55 +0200
Message-ID: <1536368.e5g6sdTPab@strawberry>
In-Reply-To: <4FDEA4E2-F96D-4A2B-BE6C-04808CFEC74B@jonasschnelli.ch>
References: <CAO3Pvs8ccTkgrecJG6KFbBW+9moHF-FTU+4qNfayeE3hM9uRrg@mail.gmail.com>
	<2778650.T23JsbTI1Y@strawberry>
	<4FDEA4E2-F96D-4A2B-BE6C-04808CFEC74B@jonasschnelli.ch>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP Proposal: Compact Client Side Filtering for
	Light Clients
Precedence: list

On Monday, 19 June 2017 18:30:18 CEST Jonas Schnelli wrote:
> I personally would ALWAYS [snip]

I mentioned that it was a usability point for a reason, and your personal=20
behavior makes me want to quote one of the main UX guidelines;=20
  =E2=80=9CYou are not your user=E2=80=9D

http://uxmyths.com/post/715988395/myth-you-are-like-your-users
older;
http://52weeksofux.com/post/385981879/you-are-not-your-user

I think we should defer to actual real numbers and user reseach, as has bee=
n=20
quoted by Andreas. You disagreeing based on your own experience and behavio=
r=20
is worse than useless. As the above links show.

Don=E2=80=99t fall in that trap :)
=2D-=20
Tom Zander
Blog: https://zander.github.io
Vlog: https://vimeo.com/channels/tomscryptochannel