Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97EFCB35 for ; Tue, 4 Apr 2017 14:59:14 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-oi0-f41.google.com (mail-oi0-f41.google.com [209.85.218.41]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20B07143 for ; Tue, 4 Apr 2017 14:59:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi0-f41.google.com with SMTP id b187so165866966oif.0 for ; Tue, 04 Apr 2017 07:59:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=KNZ0EsQrDlXupFjVcpZrG2mxdwsFeEUqUIBH69qzct0=; b=eaiqWe6jFUTtAfXGipQ7XPkySY9CosNca5LYb7QglWcl1I21z0Vdll52s/q/CembNn NmK0UF4O4RqvSDuk4a3X2WOEYwRoCOH8Y4G9Pyd0t7mvcomcTX3zu5mAqFH9aLNOXP3x bUIZAUGa0d4uWmws3VGN0AI1v3Nji0PBqD0A8FL9w3bb2jBELAnc3sYfVkTzOYrcet7v LWGWND5vwc3NddGwpgL0xs7MKCLrCq8Pph6eWiQCN87DAV74ttVMQ78910Wu5bsFxw5a E6b1yPaDvnUBDoS/Y0LgF+jhRMzOwteXkB2EFYtAH0z1DSsPZQEibSAuziI3hwUBKGF5 yi5g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=KNZ0EsQrDlXupFjVcpZrG2mxdwsFeEUqUIBH69qzct0=; b=r+VQpg7Ba28mRuVrSVDsbvQ8sjzv0u9cKBXtJw42lIptooH2shsjqz4CHZIppQUl3b c98hTBL2sbWQmrIBFsIQ7z2UwBNQsX6ul9E7F3f1aolUI18R47UlAmUzkxYyvFXWfzuE pMByIgcbb/wSTdF5C23Mepgfsyrw3tHK2sRFH58A/bEtGH/dVYa3Q+EqwG9GWPKsuqhh 2WW8XoHBtdOlk3RygQRZ9FeDydNtszzOc6+rrMvBUwPsdZ4zUDm7c+NRmol2FtaDgSl7 Y+1xIjsvsNGA/cqn/5kLDoghpE2y5KSm+1wOkypuGDeYgr9CSeBFuVouOnasJktPOkri TlbQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H34LE1awD5LjV3jLPVZ8KZ29XUQnc56PuOaYiCT0/92MV4FGzOEq6DkDty7Nlw17Z7RtTKX1bpBdOutgg== X-Received: by 10.202.79.134 with SMTP id d128mr12384755oib.209.1491317953356; Tue, 04 Apr 2017 07:59:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.116.74 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Apr 2017 07:59:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <7465915.Qhm6HcGyAn@strawberry> References: <2D094CEC-3756-45B0-970F-1EB33DF352C5@xbt.hk> <7465915.Qhm6HcGyAn@strawberry> From: James Hilliard Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2017 09:59:12 -0500 Message-ID: To: Tom Zander , Bitcoin Protocol Discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP draft: Extended block header hardfork X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2017 14:59:14 -0000 It is a consensus rule https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0034.mediawiki On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 6:47 AM, Tom Zander via bitcoin-dev wrote: > On Sunday, 2 April 2017 22:39:13 CEST Russell O'Connor via bitcoin-dev > wrote: >> Someone told me a while back that it would be more natural if we move the >> nHeight from the coinbase script to the coinbase locktime. Have you >> considered doing this? > > That change would not be a consensus change and thus free to make any day. > > -- > Tom Zander > Blog: https://zander.github.io > Vlog: https://vimeo.com/channels/tomscryptochannel > _______________________________________________ > bitcoin-dev mailing list > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev