Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <luke@dashjr.org>) id 1Rc2Bx-0008Rk-Lu
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Sat, 17 Dec 2011 21:53:17 +0000
X-ACL-Warn: 
Received: from zinan.dashjr.org ([173.242.112.54])
	by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	id 1Rc2Bv-0002Wz-GY for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Sat, 17 Dec 2011 21:53:17 +0000
Received: from ishibashi.localnet (fl-184-4-160-40.dhcp.embarqhsd.net
	[184.4.160.40]) (Authenticated sender: luke-jr)
	by zinan.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 02BA956054A
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Sat, 17 Dec 2011 21:53:10 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Luke-Jr" <luke@dashjr.org>
To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2011 16:52:19 -0500
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.1.4-gentoo; KDE/4.7.3; x86_64; ; )
References: <201112170132.26201.luke@dashjr.org>
In-Reply-To: <201112170132.26201.luke@dashjr.org>
X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: CE5A D56A 36CC 69FA E7D2 3558 665F C11D D53E 9583
X-PGP-Key-ID: 665FC11DD53E9583
X-PGP-Keyserver: x-hkp://subkeys.pgp.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201112171652.22148.luke@dashjr.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-2.2 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
	domain 0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Headers-End: 1Rc2Bv-0002Wz-GY
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Pubkey addresses
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2011 21:53:17 -0000

I propose that full public key addresses be required to be "compact" (length 
33), and use version 21 (begins with '4', and is redundant with ver 20 for 20-
byte data). Any reason this wouldn't be workable?