Message-ID: <1486828666.21100.115.camel@stafverhaegen.be>
From: Staf Verhaegen <staf@stafverhaegen.be>
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2017 16:57:46 +0100
In-Reply-To: <CAAcC9yuzgKWGXxbZLM+21pvRZmYV+nDAMBWMpZXCg6RUYHXRWQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAGCNRJqNg9-aYG62OxTz5RJyx+JJkx-kt2odooZWs92f5teZiw@mail.gmail.com>
	<201702030024.10232.luke@dashjr.org>
	<CAGLBAhdzPOC6MppMyuL6SwnoY_D829ZRs78pTF47k3rnHPjE1A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAMBsKS9Jmah6jc-pYNNOmJSJS+mHSJ9PchWnQ=BixX0C-hg4ig@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGCNRJpgvoyjKR8RcsOacWD0YboVK+enFPEV+heXFZp9Svau_A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAcC9yuzgKWGXxbZLM+21pvRZmYV+nDAMBWMpZXCg6RUYHXRWQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256";
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-kb6lcioZKYv5Bsja0Vns"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Pre-BIP] Community Consensus Voting System
Precedence: list


--=-kb6lcioZKYv5Bsja0Vns
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Chris Priest via bitcoin-dev schreef op vr 03-02-2017 om 16:57 [-0800]:
> Personally I think once the blocksize arguments are solved, there will
> be no more contentious changes for this voting system to deal with.
> What other contentious issues have come up in the past 3 years or so
> that wasn't blocksize/scaling related? Do other protocols like TCP/IP
> and the HTTP protocol have developers arguing every day over issues no
> one can agree on?

Yes, DRM for example.
Staf.


--=-kb6lcioZKYv5Bsja0Vns
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)

iF4EABEIAAYFAlifNH4ACgkQWIjyN0LdGqzTFwEArSWEDCqONMulEDjMmCNtFcny
62PbQaAWTDAeAZHtn68A/3R4hB3x4D59UD4jU+jszp2iqZZA6maAk8gMADRSO0cR
=L5f7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-kb6lcioZKYv5Bsja0Vns--