From: "Luke-Jr" <luke@dashjr.org>
To: slush <slush@centrum.cz>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 20:01:05 +0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.12.6-gentoo; KDE/4.11.5; x86_64; ; )
References: <CANEZrP2hbBVGqytmXR1rAcVama4ONnR586Se-Ch=dsxOzy2O4w@mail.gmail.com>
	<201404231955.09287.luke@dashjr.org>
	<CAJna-Hhm-BDneR_qVzFtrGaMzs-7R-z5V49CVVv79mdOfBCD-w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJna-Hhm-BDneR_qVzFtrGaMzs-7R-z5V49CVVv79mdOfBCD-w@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201404232001.06679.luke@dashjr.org>
Cc: "bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net"
	<bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] New BIP32 structure
Precedence: list

On Wednesday, April 23, 2014 7:57:46 PM slush wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 9:55 PM, Luke-Jr <luke@dashjr.org> wrote:
> > Any wallet should import all the coins just fine, it just wouldn't *use*
> > any
> > account other than 0. Remember addresses are used to receive bitcoins;
> > once the UTXOs are in the wallet, they are no longer associated with the
> > address or
> > any other details of how they were received.
> 
> Wallet don't see UTXO until it scans all branches/accounts on HD node
> import.

Yes, it should scan all possible (under the BIP-defined structure) branches 
regardless of which features it supports.

Luke