Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <rme@i-rme.es>) id 1XJl4u-0007at-FE
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Tue, 19 Aug 2014 15:12:04 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of i-rme.es
	designates 209.85.213.180 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.213.180; envelope-from=rme@i-rme.es;
	helo=mail-ig0-f180.google.com; 
Received: from mail-ig0-f180.google.com ([209.85.213.180])
	by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1XJl4t-0002ab-6y
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Tue, 19 Aug 2014 15:12:04 +0000
Received: by mail-ig0-f180.google.com with SMTP id l13so9775828iga.7
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Tue, 19 Aug 2014 08:11:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
	:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
	bh=gMk7AxLUVTsg0fLNrMnwJVWEJ16fzfnkHYtoFbSpPA4=;
	b=lEajIPcLa68qcrSnVmXvcLcXypllBD8/H6RPB/0ivwsJLgIkgT8XICD7S8YjpJlbgu
	1lCWs2guY7KTNn1eKLdMUgDE/l2tHR0meFdht7+ALcttdlCbwizEKskQRvEjyNVcb9ZH
	BIsSFFwh6D/kQ/K+yFlKAHBz8EMvX2HjnsrPEeeMrENUSSwmGkhO74uvO1VTgwtpiRhQ
	7aNiVZiocWyfriLwq16PMhHcIkYVDXMdCJda6UpcrXuJL5KRWrm7+BkSS4jSlc2Q+/9O
	BLa6FcArUikafcRfp+H4o3moK+UtVSzx0TqbIS2GX9mOvmFp89sDbTiwy0drMITZ0sQd
	FJEA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnp9kS0cIlVx5I/NlHbc6cgW+ljZTsQeOfPCI6mAeOx3tkHEoq/o7Tyv6CArNQaU1aBL0r4
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.43.193 with SMTP id y1mr6420353igl.32.1408461117544; Tue,
	19 Aug 2014 08:11:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.107.25.15 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 08:11:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [85.251.84.81]
Received: by 10.107.25.15 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 08:11:57 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <0C0EF7F9-DBBA-4872-897D-63CFA3853726@ricmoo.com>
References: <CA+8=xuJ+YDTNjyDW7DvP8KPN_nrFWpE68HvLw6EokFa-B-QGKw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+8=xuKRyO1=bu7cgNGHvtAeqgKBxjTH2uUkb61GdCuEQWEu5A@mail.gmail.com>
	<0C0EF7F9-DBBA-4872-897D-63CFA3853726@ricmoo.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 17:11:57 +0200
Message-ID: <CA+8=xu+KWSF6XYgH-_t87na6M6UOD0CM1su8sizxn5a4b0_Xrw@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?B?UmHDumwgTWFydMOtbmV6?= <rme@i-rme.es>
To: Richard Moore <me@ricmoo.com>,
	Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0111d1be9774a30500fce82c
X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	1.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
	author's domain
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1XJl4t-0002ab-6y
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: Encrypt bitcoin messages
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 15:12:04 -0000

--089e0111d1be9774a30500fce82c
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Only messages between peers are encrypted, only during transit.

Before sending a transaction to Node B you use his public key, so Node B
has the key
El 19/08/2014 17:05, "Richard Moore" <me@ricmoo.com> escribi=C3=B3:

> If you encrypt all messages with an asymmetric cipher, how would each nod=
e
> make use of the blockchain in an encrypted form? Each node would be able =
to
> encrypt the data, but only the Bitcoin Core Dev could decrypt it?
>
>
> On Aug 19, 2014, at 5:49 AM, Ra=C3=BAl Mart=C3=ADnez <rme@i-rme.es> wrote=
:
>
> Hi,
> I believe that all comunications should be encrypted by default, no matte=
r
> that is public information (tx info), the only exception I would make wou=
ld
> be block packets (to avoid increasing propagation time).
>
> I suggest that Bitcoin Core should generate a public/private key pair and
> share the public one with peers.
>
> This could provide privacy and integrity but not autentication.
>
> This way you can impersonate a bitcoin node (active mitm) but you cant
> just be passive and record all transactions send or recieved by an IP
> address.
>
> Today you can just watch for incoming/outgoing transactions to determine
> what tx are created in the Node, when you find one you can see the Bitcoi=
n
> address inputs and outputs and track that person's bitcoins.
>
> As an example, SSH provides this kind of encryption, althogh Bitcoin Core
> should ignore fingerprint changes (caused due to reinstalls).
>
> Please feel free to disqus why this is not needed or why you like this
> idea.
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-----
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>
>
> .=C2=B7=C2=B4=C2=AF`=C2=B7.=C2=B8=C2=B8.=C2=B7=C2=B4=C2=AF`=C2=B7.=C2=B8=
=C2=B8.=C2=B7=C2=B4=C2=AF`=C2=B7.=C2=B8=C2=B8.=C2=B7=C2=B4=C2=AF`=C2=B7.=C2=
=B8=C2=B8.=C2=B7=C2=B4=C2=AF`=C2=B7.=C2=B8><(((=C2=BA>
>
> Richard Moore ~ Founder
> Genetic Mistakes Software inc.
> phone: (778) 882-6125
> email: ricmoo@geneticmistakes.com
> www: http://GeneticMistakes.com
>
>

--089e0111d1be9774a30500fce82c
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<p dir=3D"ltr">Only messages between peers are encrypted, only during trans=
it.</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">Before sending a transaction to Node B you use his public ke=
y, so Node B has the key</p>
<div class=3D"gmail_quote">El 19/08/2014 17:05, &quot;Richard Moore&quot; &=
lt;<a href=3D"mailto:me@ricmoo.com">me@ricmoo.com</a>&gt; escribi=C3=B3:<br=
 type=3D"attribution"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0=
 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div style=3D"word-wrap:break-word">If you encrypt all messages with an asy=
mmetric cipher, how would each node make use of the blockchain in an encryp=
ted form? Each node would be able to encrypt the data, but only the Bitcoin=
 Core Dev could decrypt it?<div>
<br></div><div><br><div><div>On Aug 19, 2014, at 5:49 AM, Ra=C3=BAl Mart=C3=
=ADnez &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:rme@i-rme.es" target=3D"_blank">rme@i-rme.es</=
a>&gt; wrote:</div><br><blockquote type=3D"cite"><p dir=3D"ltr">Hi,<br>
I believe that all comunications should be encrypted by default, no matter =
that is public information (tx info), the only exception I would make would=
 be block packets (to avoid increasing propagation time).</p><p dir=3D"ltr"=
>
I suggest that Bitcoin Core should generate a public/private key pair and s=
hare the public one with peers.</p><p dir=3D"ltr">This could provide privac=
y and integrity but not autentication.</p><p dir=3D"ltr">This way you can i=
mpersonate a bitcoin node (active mitm) but you cant just be passive and re=
cord all transactions send or recieved by an IP address.</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">Today you can just watch for incoming/outgoing transactions =
to determine what tx are created in the Node, when you find one you can see=
 the Bitcoin address inputs and outputs and track that person&#39;s bitcoin=
s.<br>

</p><p dir=3D"ltr">As an example, SSH provides this kind of encryption, alt=
hogh Bitcoin Core should ignore fingerprint changes (caused due to reinstal=
ls).</p><p dir=3D"ltr">Please feel free to disqus why this is not needed or=
 why you like this idea.</p>

---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
---<br>_______________________________________________<br>Bitcoin-developme=
nt mailing list<br><a href=3D"mailto:Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.=
net" target=3D"_blank">Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development=
" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-de=
velopment</a><br></blockquote></div><br><div>
<span style=3D"border-collapse:separate;color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Helvet=
ica;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;letter-spacing=
:normal;line-height:normal;text-align:auto;text-indent:0px;text-transform:n=
one;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px">.=C2=B7=C2=B4=C2=AF`=C2=B7.=C2=B8=
=C2=B8.=C2=B7=C2=B4=C2=AF`=C2=B7.=C2=B8=C2=B8.=C2=B7=C2=B4=C2=AF`=C2=B7.=C2=
=B8=C2=B8.=C2=B7=C2=B4=C2=AF`=C2=B7.=C2=B8=C2=B8.=C2=B7=C2=B4=C2=AF`=C2=B7.=
=C2=B8&gt;&lt;(((=C2=BA&gt;<br>
<br>Richard Moore ~ Founder<br>Genetic Mistakes Software inc.<br>phone: (77=
8) 882-6125<br>email:=C2=A0<a href=3D"mailto:ricmoo@geneticmistakes.com" ta=
rget=3D"_blank">ricmoo@geneticmistakes.com</a><br>www:=C2=A0<a href=3D"http=
://GeneticMistakes.com/" target=3D"_blank">http://GeneticMistakes.com</a></=
span>
</div>
<br></div></div></blockquote></div>

--089e0111d1be9774a30500fce82c--