Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1SXjAH-0005Lj-0z for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 25 May 2012 01:18:01 +0000 X-ACL-Warn: Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f47.google.com ([209.85.215.47]) by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1SXjAG-0003jC-AY for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 25 May 2012 01:18:01 +0000 Received: by lags15 with SMTP id s15so450280lag.34 for ; Thu, 24 May 2012 18:17:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=rcadzVM+ISRRERFdzgy4IJSqTszRBF1lsUW/v25J+s4=; b=Mk3kk2jARYT2qqkDTxaycCEIbiYuKnAufpCnw+s2fRt4xWuC4rah5Kt8s8PiUtVqCi 24k3EA0I1m8jF0vknD6ZFJGGZ1UCeXfG3WbeIO7Xo0Sc2NAuJmSlkqXcU46dD6ae5vnk a1osiCBZ5fTTgsn3E8XGIiUmYxmlA32eXGfcn0TEhYSz0nt5OipVrY2cX8hPOG3Si99z NAHV+rx/kh4eQ2VHpJrxrxA2jp1tZpkjDR9Zv9d5w2cSbQcJ8AJf/CjTzpB8G+UvQ8pf maKSoQ/pW12nIzXnxrNKcjCq/EWkURIK5X1/YiGMFnTUi3zXyS0Yth/NQ32dB2fMrYYx yDBQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.17.227 with SMTP id r3mr660350lbd.41.1337908673616; Thu, 24 May 2012 18:17:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.0.103 with HTTP; Thu, 24 May 2012 18:17:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [99.43.178.25] In-Reply-To: <201205250057.39749.luke@dashjr.org> References: <201205250045.24540.luke@dashjr.org> <201205250057.39749.luke@dashjr.org> Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 21:17:53 -0400 Message-ID: From: Jeff Garzik To: Luke-Jr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlSpNlPk93ccS2LI3UI0hp/lEvXRM0UgWy0ByqyPVOpOfyr+f3oVoJgkwbUnZv1smgxTp0q X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-Headers-End: 1SXjAG-0003jC-AY Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Punishing empty blocks? X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 01:18:01 -0000 On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 8:57 PM, Luke-Jr wrote: > Block times are not accurate enough for that. The times in your log are very accurate, assuming your system clock is remotely accurate. -- Jeff Garzik exMULTI, Inc. jgarzik@exmulti.com