Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CBA5409 for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 19:26:25 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com (mail-wi0-f178.google.com [209.85.212.178]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E04581A4 for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 19:26:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wicne3 with SMTP id ne3so34314649wic.0 for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 12:26:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=+2Asm4AniaSJQ6f2B7YlFuU95H/k6gYkejJXhwuNEo8=; b=VzRs68mZMCRhlpMSPhatnrhnAcE1XmbQMewLty6hxgHXJB/FG/fH0wJOiap1qIB/S0 sDej/rQ7a8pxPRm+EZbfvPVyfaaXoLleBLv1XIcFSTzKHLgMXQb4C1woKCPs16VU/eOP E41fJJOFXFQKVqgt58gRon8nXxzoSv3qJaTg70MHiUxJ11O8E+B50N3Xhi8uKxIhQK9R +cnXi3EUHFlVb42d9G6UykXpjwX28FXCGoe6pnspd5mSsXFMiyP7vtImWw0lCacsq5WV wT5hGV+9FSFqSu9ilYQlnm+3mFJI99Jg7LZvyc4QdFxE8h2mMowrLxwWeQ9CwJHWDa6G 68MQ== X-Received: by 10.180.105.234 with SMTP id gp10mr15236307wib.40.1439234783796; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 12:26:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from erisian.com.au (tmo-102-58.customers.d1-online.com. [80.187.102.58]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ev2sm15200385wib.21.2015.08.10.12.26.21 (version=TLS1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 10 Aug 2015 12:26:22 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Anthony Towns Received: by erisian.com.au (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 11 Aug 2015 03:26:20 +0800 Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 03:26:20 +0800 From: Anthony Towns To: Hector Chu Message-ID: <20150810192620.GA12450@navy> References: <55C7D234.1040306@bitmarkets.net> <20150810185031.GA31610@navy> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Off-chain transactions and miner fees X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 19:26:25 -0000 On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 08:14:08PM +0100, Hector Chu wrote: > On 10 August 2015 at 19:50, Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev < > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > ...but I think at present the time value of bitcoin is effectively zero > Since bitcoin is liquid you forget that one can just sell off his bitcoin > for fiat and hold that for interest. The time value is thus given by the > yield curve of interest rates. Sure, that's a way to increase your net worth in real terms, but it only works if your interest rate on your fiat account is greater than the price rise in bitcoin over the same term. If you pull out a BTC today at $300, put it in a bank account earning 3% interest for a year and then buy $309 worth of bitcoin when the price has risen to $400 per BTC, and only get 0.7725 of a bitcoin, that's not a winning proposition. I'd call that earning a -22.75% rate (in bitcoin terms), while a 0% rate would just be ending up with as many bitcoin after a year as you started with. Note that in USD (and real) terms, in this scenario 77% of a bitcoin is actually worth more after a year than 1 bitcoin is now. You might get a positive rate of return on bitcoin invested today by running an exchange or a gambling service of some sort; but I think mostly, people are just sitting on their coins hoping they appreciate. If so, (in my terminology at least) they're earning 0%, denominated in bitcoin, and have a time-value of bitcoin of zero. Cheers, aj