Message-ID: <1327704664.31621.YahooMailNeo@web121003.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:51:04 -0800 (PST)
From: Amir Taaki <zgenjix@yahoo.com>
To: "bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net"
	<bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="-2027350018-185279707-1327704664=:31621"
Subject: [Bitcoin-development] BIP 0020: URI Scheme
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Amir Taaki <zgenjix@yahoo.com>

---2027350018-185279707-1327704664=:31621
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

BIP 0020 is the old URI scheme BIPisized.

ATM it is Draft status.

I do not know enough about the discussion back last year to know whether to move it to Accepted status or not. My feelings are that having a re-decision (even if it was accepted last year) is healthy since it makes no sense to have a standard before a standardisation process existed.

For now, it is Draft status until there's a general agreement.

---2027350018-185279707-1327704664=:31621
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii

<html><body><div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:12pt"><div>BIP 0020 is the old URI scheme BIPisized.</div><div><br></div><div>ATM it is Draft status.</div><div><br></div><div>I do not know enough about the discussion back last year to know whether to move it to Accepted status or not. My feelings are that having a re-decision (even if it was accepted last year) is healthy since it makes no sense to have a standard before a standardisation process existed.</div><div><br></div><div>For now, it is Draft status until there's a general agreement.</div><div><br></div></div></body></html>
---2027350018-185279707-1327704664=:31621--