MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CADL_X_duSHosyMAfOXPv7WcWKTY19Q2i+_zFSuuGbGantbbmRw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAAO2FKGS9+0pMa_iF+TNc7nnAqniE7vjTHapvubdce7=aSyBEg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADL_X_duSHosyMAfOXPv7WcWKTY19Q2i+_zFSuuGbGantbbmRw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Hector Chu <hectorchu@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 12:48:28 +0100
Message-ID: <CAAO2FKE44WqJOEaR2TYRwzAsPQxh7Z1K3esQiMFsSsk2+65-4w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jameson Lopp <jameson.lopp@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] A solution to increase the incentive of running a
	node
Precedence: list

On 19 August 2015 at 12:42, Jameson Lopp <jameson.lopp@gmail.com> wrote:
> If you can actually come up with a technical solution that allows for a node
> operator to prove to the rest of the network that they are running an honest
> full node that hosts the entire blockchain, then you can move forward with a
> direct monetary incentivization proposal. To my knowledge no one has been
> successful in that endeavor. To be more clear, your proposal would need to
> be able to differentiate between a full node and a pseudonode.
> https://github.com/basil00/PseudoNode

The proof is in the validation of transactions. How can a node
reliably validate transactions unless it has the past history of
transactions? Entire blockchain not required or necessary, but that's
a plus.