Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1WO9mo-0007nY-QT for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 17:51:18 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.214.179 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.214.179; envelope-from=mh.in.england@gmail.com; helo=mail-ob0-f179.google.com; Received: from mail-ob0-f179.google.com ([209.85.214.179]) by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1WO9mn-0003H7-QO for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 17:51:18 +0000 Received: by mail-ob0-f179.google.com with SMTP id va2so1409025obc.10 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 10:51:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.174.170 with SMTP id bt10mr2471797oec.47.1394733072408; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 10:51:12 -0700 (PDT) Sender: mh.in.england@gmail.com Received: by 10.76.71.231 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 10:51:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5321EC89.6020300@gmail.com> References: <52852C2D.9020103@gmail.com> <52853D8A.6010501@monetize.io> <5321D95C.2070402@gmail.com> <5321E87B.8050908@monetize.io> <5321EC89.6020300@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 18:51:12 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 5ta-yjVrVhk2gxHpSih9kx3NyjE Message-ID: From: Mike Hearn To: Alan Reiner Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bd6c52c566a3704f480995b X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (mh.in.england[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1WO9mn-0003H7-QO Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] moving the default display to mbtc X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 17:51:18 -0000 --047d7bd6c52c566a3704f480995b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > Well it looks like the consensus is to do it, instead of talking about > it. I'm going to make sure we get uBTC into the next Armory release. > Hmm - be careful with the word "consensus" here. A bunch of people on a mailing list does not make consensus ;) If you survey other wallets, you'll find most already switched to mBTC, that it took some effort to do so (look at the size of the patches for instance) and that probably, nobody is super-keen to change again so soon. So uBTC would make you different to most of the other wallets and services in wide usage. If Armory wants to do that, that's no problem, maybe it will be a competitive advantage - just saying, don't quote this thread as indicating some kind of community consensus. Wallets and services that are using mBTC (that I know of) blockchain.info MultiBit Bitcoin Wallet (Android) Hive Bitcoinity KnC Wallet (defaults to BTC but can be switched to mBTC in settings, uBTC not an option) Mullvad btcstore.eu Doing a google search for [bitcoin "mBTC"] and [bitcoin "uBTC"], the former has a bunch of sites and services with prices in mBTC. The latter only has faucets, as far as I can tell, which sort of makes sense. --047d7bd6c52c566a3704f480995b Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Well i= t looks like the consensus is to do it, instead of talking about it.=C2=A0 I'm going to make sure we get uBTC into the next Ar= mory release.

Hmm - be careful with th= e word "consensus" here. A bunch of people on a mailing list does= not make consensus ;)

If you survey other wallets= , you'll find most already switched to mBTC, that it took some effort t= o do so (look at the size of the patches for instance) and that probably, n= obody is super-keen to change again so soon. So uBTC would make you differe= nt to most of the other wallets and services in wide usage.=C2=A0

If Armory wants to do that, that's no problem, mayb= e it will be a competitive advantage - just saying, don't quote this th= read as indicating some kind of community consensus.

Wallets and services that are using mBTC (that I know of)
MultiBit
Bitcoin Wallet (Android)
Hive
Bit= coinity
KnC Wallet (defaults to BTC but can be switched to mBTC in settings, u= BTC not an option)
Mullvad

Doing a google search for [bitc= oin "mBTC"] and [bitcoin "uBTC"], the former has a bunc= h of sites and services with prices in mBTC. The latter only has faucets, a= s far as I can tell, which sort of makes sense.
--047d7bd6c52c566a3704f480995b--