Delivery-date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 03:20:52 -0700 Received: from mail-yb1-f187.google.com ([209.85.219.187]) by mail.fairlystable.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rjzFb-0006KI-G3 for bitcoindev@gnusha.org; Tue, 12 Mar 2024 03:20:52 -0700 Received: by mail-yb1-f187.google.com with SMTP id 3f1490d57ef6-dcdc3db67f0sf7082928276.1 for ; Tue, 12 Mar 2024 03:20:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20230601; t=1710238845; x=1710843645; darn=gnusha.org; h=list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-help:list-post :list-id:mailing-list:precedence:x-original-sender:mime-version :subject:references:in-reply-to:message-id:to:from:date:sender:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=3P+LmOkUZYmEBbM+LO7lkf89/Qj6qF6NLVIj55ThiEU=; b=mBnlZC8qS5wjH4ZAWIOVRTwfXs5qjK01+TI89IVHIREUBmGKRtpGBg/oIYNBnDIpKG AXxnJiFUvLGAbNA2CMY0KYWb7NSxaZX1ccUQTEC9TeKER0vlSklpeBwcWNZoCYT9TBh3 v+Uw48o27WgYVTfVAKDdgn+w3h7xGfGn4P50JZYz7cR7jlFD8Kc471kttvJExi7DiEP+ sNIMfb+40K8kYTRG4J5yJRg2bvfc+TDzk+LdeMCCsD1/zCUJVzJJvzmcnutXqtDxvfkU W+2sf0am081VyRKzwKMKYOxfrfufsLN8JgiJ6x1Rl6MJQJo97HFWP90Kn7yaPyK/ZiFW qVVA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1710238845; x=1710843645; darn=gnusha.org; h=list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-help:list-post :list-id:mailing-list:precedence:x-original-sender:mime-version :subject:references:in-reply-to:message-id:to:from:date:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=3P+LmOkUZYmEBbM+LO7lkf89/Qj6qF6NLVIj55ThiEU=; b=Agysa4GdU3QG3UXGxup23xX3vqWKx7D0Qe7d4Quk06uom0vTpplr91URkqy5qQhBG0 byL34E3bUm5lWS2tW9OXNbw/sUbbPqT5tErB37FonnhQ0TeGjLm+onNZsnPr67T/g9gW 1VTWK+P3GJAW0JW+ASYgUKlX1CKLV0uw8A3stV6hxiyDszFQ4hqret/cVyfUz2jexTeI KmeeDlLORbXuVLBvJ2PCk+DsUooy+QtoptLmL9SmhqBqOg2rbKDhX+Tqs04H52rBK2Gw E5Tr2q/BYbte/4WubIrOmD23Cfk2uMnorXbo2JMeZ4siTGieTP46bWvHCaj1yqADuki7 ZW8w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1710238845; x=1710843645; h=list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-help:list-post :list-id:mailing-list:precedence:x-original-sender:mime-version :subject:references:in-reply-to:message-id:to:from:date:x-beenthere :x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=3P+LmOkUZYmEBbM+LO7lkf89/Qj6qF6NLVIj55ThiEU=; b=GzODJjlpImV2Orxk3GDJUL3yiiHwjxPy7DUCnuSCf3wntbT6tp1D4Y62o/wvmgMYHg GmWhuE1cACEZad0RnYMmCL0srwg1mIUL7YNUlDWmIX0OCoqsQEYMWxTiXbdNDgi4gTIf nu65pufABJruRb88/BFe6gSNon7Y2UEAc9Ju3gXU9yXEBB+lbnXtbHG67NyEzbRhDbbg Gn0k0b25xhjjLwnEArRDSzMCMZOb8280W9WcgJu20PpCe90fMjNa2E4X+AP7FlJj/lhI bGTf2ZKaHB2dISB4fGq9HXP9/0qZwVCan/2NKNbGB0kLTAlQ/X/qbmeWH+9TU1boaNWQ 23iA== Sender: bitcoindev@googlegroups.com X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVrE5jl2qj5uvM7M84otBPKQKbUZTLUraX1RSIkBXw6V13ewfCEOk5Ts/QjyIvBLNtDhkWHskyavrMMgLRWxodkYhLQWx4= X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyfoWuniS7Xd5HbC9ZGyXOmCGNu0axtX3LgMD9mqYWrAGsv7NLI Zr5J7V7wAZLNr5XFxXlLHTT/p5CclNwn/rYkTeGSS8nNaE4e6AB/ X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IF66PpfM6/OdnrYZbFyxYZjP0q/wplsVn3ieldeFSlH9sAHzIhNPZyMye1aoYEgEADZHXy2DA== X-Received: by 2002:a25:b05:0:b0:dcf:a42b:7e2b with SMTP id 5-20020a250b05000000b00dcfa42b7e2bmr6577369ybl.3.1710238844765; Tue, 12 Mar 2024 03:20:44 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: bitcoindev@googlegroups.com Received: by 2002:a25:c752:0:b0:dcc:4b24:c0e0 with SMTP id w79-20020a25c752000000b00dcc4b24c0e0ls1654871ybe.0.-pod-prod-06-us; Tue, 12 Mar 2024 03:20:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a05:6902:2705:b0:dc6:519b:5425 with SMTP id dz5-20020a056902270500b00dc6519b5425mr2384180ybb.11.1710238843925; Tue, 12 Mar 2024 03:20:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 2002:a0d:ea06:0:b0:609:3e5d:63d0 with SMTP id 00721157ae682-60a00a454bams7b3; Sun, 10 Mar 2024 10:27:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a81:5e88:0:b0:60a:3c86:f1ea with SMTP id s130-20020a815e88000000b0060a3c86f1eamr151661ywb.2.1710091668590; Sun, 10 Mar 2024 10:27:48 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2024 10:27:48 -0700 (PDT) From: Bitcoin Error Log To: Bitcoin Development Mailing List Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <27a5460c-518b-45dd-b48b-570c1681887dn@googlegroups.com> References: <2092f7ff-4860-47f8-ba1a-c9d97927551e@achow101.com> <27a5460c-518b-45dd-b48b-570c1681887dn@googlegroups.com> Subject: [bitcoindev] Re: Adding New BIP Editors MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_97318_14580928.1710091668229" X-Original-Sender: bitcoinerrorlog@gmail.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bitcoindev@googlegroups.com; contact bitcoindev+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 786775582512 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) ------=_Part_97318_14580928.1710091668229 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_97319_810522981.1710091668229" ------=_Part_97319_810522981.1710091668229 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I'd support Atak, Bishop, or Somsen, fwiw.=20 On Sunday, March 10, 2024 at 5:12:16=E2=80=AFPM UTC Michael Folkson wrote: > +1 on Kanzure and RubenSomsen > > I would put my name forward if Kanzure, RubenSomsen weren't willing to do= =20 > it and I was concerned about who it might be. I don't think it should be= =20 > someone the Bitcoin dev community isn't familiar with and hasn't proven= =20 > themselves over a long period of time like Kanzure, RubenSomsen have. The= re=20 > is the opportunity for a new BIP editor to cause chaos if they were of th= e=20 > wrong temperament and weren't willing to acknowledge opposing views and= =20 > perspectives. Both Kanzure and RubenSomsen have proved over a long period= =20 > of time that although they have their own personal views (like anyone els= e)=20 > they won't censor transcripts of presentations or emails to the bitcoin-d= ev=20 > mailing list that contain opposing views to their own. I'm not sure if an= y=20 > of the other candidates putting themselves forward here tick the same box= es=20 > as Kanzure and RubenSomsen. I also don't think BIP editors should be Luke= =20 > Dashjr's personal fiefdom even though overall I personally think Luke has= =20 > done an excellent job over many years as BIP editor in sometimes difficul= t=20 > circumstances. > > Thanks > Michael > > On Tuesday, February 27, 2024 at 7:27:57=E2=80=AFPM UTC Ava Chow wrote: > >> Hi All,=20 >> >> Following on the recent [discussion][1] about BIP process friction, and= =20 >> admissions from Luke that he has not had the time to actively work on=20 >> the BIPs repo ([2], [3]), I think it is prudent for us to look at adding= =20 >> more BIPs editors. These people would have the same permissions and=20 >> responsibilities that Luke has, i.e. can assign BIP numbers, merge PRs= =20 >> adding new BIPs, merge PRs to fix existing BIPs,and all other=20 >> responsibilities as described in [BIP 2][4]. I think this would=20 >> significantly help get through the backlog of BIPs PRs, and responding= =20 >> to them in a timely manner to significantly reduce the friction of=20 >> getting BIPs changes merged. Of course, this would require that all BIP= =20 >> editors agree on the numbering scheme so that BIPs continue to be=20 >> numbered consistently.=20 >> >> Considering the responsibilities of these tasks, I think any new BIP=20 >> editors should be people who have a history of following and being=20 >> involved in Bitcoin development, as well as being known to evaluate=20 >> proposals objectively, and of course, are willing to do the job. With=20 >> that in mind, I think both Kanzure and RubenSomsen are very good=20 >> candidates to be BIP editors, and having both of them working on the=20 >> BIPs repo would greatly benefit all of us.=20 >> >> Thanks,=20 >> Ava=20 >> >> [1]:=20 >> >> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2024-January/022= 289.html=20 >> [2]:=20 >> >> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2024-January/022= 291.html=20 >> [3]: https://twitter.com/LukeDashjr/status/1761127972302459000=20 >> [4]:=20 >> >> https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0002.mediawiki#user-cont= ent-BIP_Editor_Responsibilities__Workflow=20 >> >> --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Bitcoin Development Mailing List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bitcoindev+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/= bitcoindev/ad284018-e99c-4552-88ca-11b9ed340661n%40googlegroups.com. ------=_Part_97319_810522981.1710091668229 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I'd support Atak, Bishop, or Somsen, fwiw.=C2=A0

On Sunday, March 10= , 2024 at 5:12:16=E2=80=AFPM UTC Michael Folkson wrote:
+1 on Kanzure and RubenSomsen
I would put my name forward if Kanzure, RubenSomsen weren&= #39;t willing to do it and I was concerned about who it might be. I don'= ;t think it should be someone the Bitcoin dev community isn't familiar = with and hasn't proven themselves over a long period of time like Kanzu= re, RubenSomsen have. There is the opportunity for a new BIP editor to caus= e chaos if they were of the wrong temperament and weren't willing to ac= knowledge opposing views and perspectives. Both Kanzure and RubenSomsen hav= e proved over a long period of time that although they have their own perso= nal views (like anyone else) they won't censor transcripts of presentat= ions or emails to the bitcoin-dev mailing list that contain opposing views = to their own. I'm not sure if any of the other candidates putting thems= elves forward here tick the same boxes as Kanzure and RubenSomsen. I also d= on't think BIP editors should be Luke Dashjr's personal fiefdom eve= n though overall I personally think Luke has done an excellent job over man= y years as BIP editor in sometimes difficult circumstances.

<= /div>
Thanks
Michael

=
On Tuesday, February 27, 2024 at 7:2= 7:57=E2=80=AFPM UTC Ava Chow wrote:
Hi All,

Following on the recent [discussion][1] about BIP process friction, and= =20
admissions from Luke that he has not had the time to actively work on= =20
the BIPs repo ([2], [3]), I think it is prudent for us to look at addin= g=20
more BIPs editors. These people would have the same permissions and=20
responsibilities that Luke has, i.e. can assign BIP numbers, merge PRs= =20
adding new BIPs, merge PRs to fix existing BIPs,and all other=20
responsibilities as described in [BIP 2][4]. I think this would=20
significantly help get through the backlog of BIPs PRs, and responding= =20
to them in a timely manner to significantly reduce the friction of=20
getting BIPs changes merged. Of course, this would require that all BIP= =20
editors agree on the numbering scheme so that BIPs continue to be=20
numbered consistently.

Considering the responsibilities of these tasks, I think any new BIP=20
editors should be people who have a history of following and being=20
involved in Bitcoin development, as well as being known to evaluate=20
proposals objectively, and of course, are willing to do the job. With= =20
that in mind, I think both Kanzure and RubenSomsen are very good=20
candidates to be BIP editors, and having both of them working on the=20
BIPs repo would greatly benefit all of us.

Thanks,
Ava

[1]:=20
https://l= ists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2024-January/022289.html
[2]:=20
https://l= ists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2024-January/022291.html
[3]: https://twitter.com/LukeDashjr/status/176112797230= 2459000
[4]:=20
https://github.= com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0002.mediawiki#user-content-BIP_Editor_Res= ponsibilities__Workflow

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;Bitcoin Development Mailing List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bitcoind= ev+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg= id/bitcoindev/ad284018-e99c-4552-88ca-11b9ed340661n%40googlegroups.com.=
------=_Part_97319_810522981.1710091668229-- ------=_Part_97318_14580928.1710091668229--