Return-Path: <lloyd.fourn@gmail.com>
Received: from silver.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136])
 by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89708C013E
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Fri,  6 Mar 2020 06:40:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by silver.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7320C203D7
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Fri,  6 Mar 2020 06:40:52 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
Received: from silver.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id OR5LRUVBaoLF
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Fri,  6 Mar 2020 06:40:51 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-io1-f54.google.com (mail-io1-f54.google.com
 [209.85.166.54])
 by silver.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 961551FE49
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Fri,  6 Mar 2020 06:40:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-io1-f54.google.com with SMTP id n21so1036147ioo.10
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Thu, 05 Mar 2020 22:40:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=7IEaIRBCFt5+OIE+ngsbrS79AOkLjF5JCCgu0tZgc3Q=;
 b=R6IFhlTep3zPahG31dlrUKYhFToLNRWi3ugKl5hBwcFr40th+H3UKeN74E2UifPBn4
 9gDYRZVwVMFTu+5FmCWVKo++I+QYyLMV4Cy93TE6C6gi8taFdI3Urry8PYpW2pHTiljZ
 Ofe1cbLsa7kfpsYzOjtdqpmBNpI3UAajhu5lASPwpu8g6PV09jJmn3udEa0LnwNEl3eC
 jufCOqnVLYWHZW59Ik3lr6gs8r+Xgu8rczI5+1YDLp/C0kT89zRN9XZ5upnzA8G6hxMC
 PbZaa3x1X7l83b8HZ74jzok4TUWum9zKs7KmA384HJarOKcPS+3goFneT44rVcioK6Xd
 uFLw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to;
 bh=7IEaIRBCFt5+OIE+ngsbrS79AOkLjF5JCCgu0tZgc3Q=;
 b=BiSGM2/Cg5uPXEz5bqNATWShYXexCWQcGx9GO9T9fYEFa8d1ObWHUfSc5SIwbPoccf
 7WIzOsep7xRmeadA8pJSj9dXyEwb7DIy4AWr4kCq7icXNEhVXNCBBEqo58Udr3ooC8j3
 oD7Y85r8Z9sm/Kv6eC9y59QbDCuh+WNuD/JOsoN7D3DsaXFHVO0QhmBEwObRJ5L8cFr0
 Ingx8+4P4yIp3Ku6c4O3twx7++tZ7TXnj2/M4QMn/WA2L7UDLAK1AZ/h5jaFObM5PkS5
 Iy3Eqorf0I01i4AkRO0Q0xp+kDXTB7ifufx0Jf4V31DArBYPgHdgsoDu7TWcvlzOKF5P
 J6pg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ1Uu9RLKPKQfBiEcVvybN/Axo3OXGi1fpygJD8SZB/cfh+sTz41
 3P65VmZtnIeFSKkDszztt0KvUPEinwm6Mx8l8YJiWpAN
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vvaf2Hiz1PxKV/uElu05sh/L1iGzHZl0S0bZVmfQNIjNTAEL2NLLclAX6XsQGrKM7fOgFHPNiQBzSqyskEU4Rw=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:cba5:: with SMTP id v5mr1674284jap.64.1583476850813;
 Thu, 05 Mar 2020 22:40:50 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAJowKg+Sgfv-FxZ2gyYWO4HmVwVFZjpjN3RkGN4y1TJwpuLMtQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJowKg+Sgfv-FxZ2gyYWO4HmVwVFZjpjN3RkGN4y1TJwpuLMtQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Lloyd Fournier <lloyd.fourn@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2020 17:40:24 +1100
Message-ID: <CAH5Bsr3CbG6b4tk0hkLECfg0LM38BNp7nfspLv+NbMg6f79iDg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Erik Aronesty <erik@q32.com>, 
 Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000033f49d05a029ef9f"
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 06 Mar 2020 08:40:00 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Schnorr sigs vs pairing sigs
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, 
 <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, 
 <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2020 06:40:52 -0000

--00000000000033f49d05a029ef9f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Hi Erik,

There are a strong arguments for and against pairing based sigs in Bitcoin.
One very strong argument in favour over non-deterministic signatures like
Schnorr over BLS is it enables a kind of signature encryption called
"adaptor signatures". This construction is key to many exciting up and
coming layer 2 protocols and isn't possible unless the signature scheme
uses randomness.

self plug: I have a paper on this topic called "One-Time Verifiably
Encrypted Signatures A.K.A Adaptor Signatures"
 https://github.com/LLFourn/one-time-VES/blob/master/main.pdf

LL


On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 6:03 AM Erik Aronesty via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> Schnorr sigs rely so heavily on the masking provided by a random
> nonce.   There are so many easy ways to introduce bias (hash + modulo,
> for example).
>
> Even 2 bits of bias can result in serious attacks:
>
> https://ecc2017.cs.ru.nl/slides/ecc2017-tibouchi.pdf
>
> Maybe pairing based sigs  - which are slower - might be both more
> flexible, and better suited to secure implemetnations?
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>

--00000000000033f49d05a029ef9f
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">Hi Erik,<div><br>There are a strong arguments for and agai=
nst pairing based sigs in Bitcoin. One very strong argument in favour over =
non-deterministic signatures like Schnorr over BLS is it enables a kind of =
signature encryption called &quot;adaptor signatures&quot;. This constructi=
on is key to many exciting up and coming layer 2 protocols and isn&#39;t po=
ssible unless the signature scheme uses randomness.=C2=A0</div><div><br></d=
iv><div>self plug: I have a paper on this topic called &quot;One-Time Verif=
iably Encrypted Signatures A.K.A Adaptor Signatures&quot;</div><div>=C2=A0<=
a href=3D"https://github.com/LLFourn/one-time-VES/blob/master/main.pdf">htt=
ps://github.com/LLFourn/one-time-VES/blob/master/main.pdf</a></div><div><br=
></div><div>LL</div><div><br></div></div><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><di=
v dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 6:03 AM Erik Aron=
esty via bitcoin-dev &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundatio=
n.org">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>&gt; wrote:<br></div><block=
quote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1=
px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Schnorr sigs rely so heavily on=
 the masking provided by a random<br>
nonce.=C2=A0 =C2=A0There are so many easy ways to introduce bias (hash + mo=
dulo,<br>
for example).<br>
<br>
Even 2 bits of bias can result in serious attacks:<br>
<br>
<a href=3D"https://ecc2017.cs.ru.nl/slides/ecc2017-tibouchi.pdf" rel=3D"nor=
eferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://ecc2017.cs.ru.nl/slides/ecc2017-tibouchi=
.pdf</a><br>
<br>
Maybe pairing based sigs=C2=A0 - which are slower - might be both more<br>
flexible, and better suited to secure implemetnations?<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
bitcoin-dev mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_blank">=
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev" =
rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mail=
man/listinfo/bitcoin-dev</a><br>
</blockquote></div>

--00000000000033f49d05a029ef9f--