Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1WG7rW-000767-0j for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 14:10:58 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of bitpay.com designates 74.125.82.169 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.169; envelope-from=jgarzik@bitpay.com; helo=mail-we0-f169.google.com; Received: from mail-we0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]) by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1WG7rT-0000bc-Ai for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 14:10:57 +0000 Received: by mail-we0-f169.google.com with SMTP id t61so375456wes.28 for ; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 06:10:49 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=qeI26SREFkuIOau6W/xpfcAhxRVApbrQAsKL+/DPJNQ=; b=Tkb09YYMiQSoEA5ymN7I4Y27kedrmklznVQ1+6YPEFn8qi7ujxHlE/5uHTuCh20S8E DV7kK07xH0grUqmGQWa0twO/bmKXvrY9C3rj+KDq41Ft2PdiCFv1s1JW4YZG5So2lc73 u7BMaGhymcXqMOJVIDwh7GKd1ZwauEHz5z6ZcLG7qoMTP4F6Cse2xVS5eTh8ZLJJUVKk TgX8XJiPnIROVb5gIffpzBKskCZQslP4twTbobpe0XthRcrFaq7B5vMwRQLJBD9U1e9N tOoQpeWk3jRzwn4rACyfoVD1sLIQXrz5h0mUQBuqp5ZsEvTUYi1UbGMfTzrc4su8mHL2 F2Aw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnZXVvQk3q8q1dqy1j8zwF0w14akF9Fn4J9uCZLb71+GkJTPCu07/hu3qwfPwX+dq1rv0Ed MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.87.162 with SMTP id az2mr1658174wib.23.1392819049187; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 06:10:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.82.197 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 06:10:49 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <5303B110.70603@bitpay.com> Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 09:10:49 -0500 Message-ID: From: Jeff Garzik To: Andreas Schildbach Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1WG7rT-0000bc-Ai Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP70 proposed changes X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 14:10:58 -0000 On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 4:40 PM, Andreas Schildbach wrote: > On 02/18/2014 08:14 PM, Ryan X. Charles wrote: >> BitPay is working on a new standard >> based on bitcoin-like addresses for authentication. It would be great if >> we could work with the community to establish a complete, decentralized >> authentication protocol. > > Sounds interesting, let us know as soon as you have anything. SINs. See https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Identity_protocol_v1 -- Jeff Garzik Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelist BitPay, Inc. https://bitpay.com/