Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from <bitcoin-list@bluematt.me>) id 1WV6ab-0000PZ-Fl for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 01 Apr 2014 21:51:25 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of bluematt.me designates 192.241.179.72 as permitted sender) client-ip=192.241.179.72; envelope-from=bitcoin-list@bluematt.me; helo=mail.bluematt.me; Received: from mail.bluematt.me ([192.241.179.72]) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) id 1WV6aa-0005IB-C4 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 01 Apr 2014 21:51:25 +0000 Received: from [22.195.238.60] (unknown [172.56.5.71]) by mail.bluematt.me (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8F1334B7B0; Tue, 1 Apr 2014 21:51:18 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: <CAAS2fgTQbeeDwheRQPw=osOZ8LLQFsiteRQPdavE6iNnuGLtAA@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAPg+sBh1_mYH4JNv1xTFnLsoC=qzmgi0QaLAyd7YeQ=wZQBDSQ@mail.gmail.com> <20140401200039.GA10403@tilt> <CAPg+sBgiqT9MARkSdTVCe37Kpkyj3-Uwe66a5U+HGnOtU6Qc7A@mail.gmail.com> <CAAS2fgTQbeeDwheRQPw=osOZ8LLQFsiteRQPdavE6iNnuGLtAA@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----W9R1IIJGURSHQ8XCZ6MT9J0F8EV5PW" From: Matt Corallo <bitcoin-list@bluematt.me> Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2014 17:51:16 -0400 To: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com>, Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com> Message-ID: <0fe42ca1-2688-4d4c-9ba5-e9e3d97f9f8c@email.android.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -1.1 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.6 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Headers-End: 1WV6aa-0005IB-C4 Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net> Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Finite monetary supply for Bitcoin X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development> List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net> List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2014 21:51:25 -0000 ------W9R1IIJGURSHQ8XCZ6MT9J0F8EV5PW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I move to reclaim bip 42 as reserved for a bip containing either a refere= nce to musical dolphins or towels in the name. Matt On April 1, 2014 5:47:34 PM EDT, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com> wro= te: >On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com> >wrote: >> In case there are no further objections (excluding from people who >> disagree with me), I'd like to request a BIP number for this. Any >> number is fine, I guess, as long as it's finite. > >With ten people commenting on this proposal there are quite a few ways >in which you could partition their views. Only one possible integer >partitioning has everyone in the same partition, so consensus seems >unlikely. > >But owing to a rather large bribe (or at least not less large than any >other offered by competing parties) I hereby assign BIP 42 for this >proposal. > >------------------------------------------------------------------------= ------ >_______________________________________________ >Bitcoin-development mailing list >Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development ------W9R1IIJGURSHQ8XCZ6MT9J0F8EV5PW Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <html><head></head><body>I move to reclaim bip 42 as reserved for a bip c= ontaining either a reference to musical dolphins or towels in the name.<b= r> <br> Matt<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On April 1, 2014 5:47:34 PM EDT, G= regory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com> wrote:<blockquote class=3D"gmai= l_quote" style=3D"margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(2= 04, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"> <pre class=3D"k9mail">On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Pieter Wuille <p= ieter.wuille@gmail.com> wrote:<br /><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" = style=3D"margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #729fcf; paddi= ng-left: 1ex;"> In case there are no further objections (excluding from p= eople who<br /> disagree with me), I'd like to request a BIP number for t= his. Any<br /> number is fine, I guess, as long as it's finite.<br /></bl= ockquote><br />With ten people commenting on this proposal there are quit= e a few ways<br />in which you could partition their views. Only one poss= ible integer<br />partitioning has everyone in the same partition, so con= sensus seems<br />unlikely.<br /><br />But owing to a rather large bribe = (or at least not less large than any<br />other offered by competing part= ies) I hereby assign BIP 42 for this<br />proposal.<br /><br /><hr /><br = /><hr /><br />Bitcoin-development mailing list<br />Bitcoin-development@l= ists.sourceforge.net<br /><a href=3D"https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development"= >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development</a><br = /></pre></blockquote></div></body></html> ------W9R1IIJGURSHQ8XCZ6MT9J0F8EV5PW--