Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1WlcyA-0000Dh-FW for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 17 May 2014 11:40:02 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of m.gmane.org designates 80.91.229.3 as permitted sender) client-ip=80.91.229.3; envelope-from=gcbd-bitcoin-development@m.gmane.org; helo=plane.gmane.org; Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]) by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) id 1Wlcy6-0002hU-Mq for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 17 May 2014 11:40:02 +0000 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Wlcxz-0004OF-IK for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 17 May 2014 13:39:51 +0200 Received: from e179039129.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.179.39.129]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 17 May 2014 13:39:51 +0200 Received: from andreas by e179039129.adsl.alicedsl.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 17 May 2014 13:39:51 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net From: Andreas Schildbach Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 13:39:40 +0200 Message-ID: References: <09E70F88-DA1C-4E3F-9342-547FB8794EAB@heliacal.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: e179039129.adsl.alicedsl.de User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2 X-Spam-Score: -1.1 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.91.229.3 listed in list.dnswl.org] -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 1.1 DKIM_ADSP_ALL No valid author signature, domain signs all mail -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.7 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Headers-End: 1Wlcy6-0002hU-Mq Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] DNS seeds unstable X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 11:40:02 -0000 I think the best way to contribute to the infrastructure is actually what we're doing: Test the current infrastructure and point out where it is not working. Trying to find solutions for problems. There is nothing gained by throwing additional hardware at a problem if the problem itself isn't understood well. On 05/17/2014 02:58 AM, Alex Kotenko wrote: > Ok, what do I need to do? How do I host a testnet seed myself? > > Best regards, > Alex Kotenko > > > 2014-05-16 23:02 GMT+01:00 Jeff Garzik >: > > There are only two testnet seeds listed in bitcoind, and one of them > returns SERVFAIL (testnet-seed.bitcoin.petertodd.org > ) and the other > just returns one A record (testnet-seed.bluematt.me > ). No idea what > seeds bitcoinj uses. > > If you are going to depend on testnet, especially for an important > demo... contribute to the infrastructure! This stuff doesn't just fix > itself for free.