Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of bitpay.com
	designates 209.85.213.181 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.213.181; envelope-from=jgarzik@bitpay.com;
	helo=mail-ig0-f181.google.com; 
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CADK=3HymjDVZKBHB0Q39C=izYNCH6hN+a7a7Mi3jeMF7E=O6qQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALqxMTHeipZZrJ_NSXK9vxiO83gSDgM6TA7T7XNBS3LtmuK2KA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADK=3HwNp9bMtpviZK0cyYc+UTEvm5589Obe5of7VbMZ06dJ4g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABaSBawmfP0m98jM_5qyHEoJmVK_UeBsc=Odf5QMb0Nw-pAp3Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADK=3HymjDVZKBHB0Q39C=izYNCH6hN+a7a7Mi3jeMF7E=O6qQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@bitpay.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 20:00:55 -0400
Message-ID: <CAJHLa0OMjFUV2QYm9vBb7CrRArfS7UWFOdtZqX6Na0JqjWssPA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Daniel Murrell <dsmurrell@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: Bitcoin-Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] side-chains & 2-way pegging (Re: is there
 a way to do bitcoin-staging?)
Precedence: list

Take the discussion of this site to another M-L, please.  It is off-topic.

Actual discussion of the paper and side-chains is on-topic.

This M-L is publicly archived.


On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Daniel Murrell <dsmurrell@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sorry Bryan, this was the first paper posted to this list since I've
> been on it that I added to my site. I was quite excited about this.
>
> I was not planning on and certainly won't be making this advertisement
> after every paper posted on this list (I may do it on reddit). I did
> post on reddit a few times yes, but I assumed that this list's user
> base didn't overlap extremely (does it?). I'm not sure why my posts
> got down voted there. The down voters gave me no constructive feedback
> about the usefulness of my site, and neither have you.
>
> Are you able to give me your feedback on the site I've spent quite
> some time setting up privately so that we don't spam this list again?
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 11:35 PM, Bryan Bishop <kanzure@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Daniel Murrell <dsmurrell@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> p.s. I'm not trying to monetize this site. I just tried to make
>>> something I thought could be useful.
>>
>> [Unsolicited administrivia follows.]
>>
>> You have been posting this in a bunch of places for a while now, at
>> least three times today by my count on other mediums. I also observed
>> negative karma scores associated with these posts. Maybe you could
>> consider toning down the message frequency? I think by now everyone
>> knows you want them to use your site. I also think that in the limit
>> that it would be inappropriate for /everyone/ to post all possible
>> research sites, or even vaguely topical discussion sites, for every
>> paper posted. Personally, I would much rather have discussions happen
>> on the mailing list anyway, although if I had a different opinion I
>> certainly hope I would still send this message.
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>> - Bryan
>> http://heybryan.org/
>> 1 512 203 0507
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development



-- 
Jeff Garzik
Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelist
BitPay, Inc.      https://bitpay.com/