Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FAEB71E for ; Tue, 10 May 2016 21:49:46 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-wm0-f47.google.com (mail-wm0-f47.google.com [74.125.82.47]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E045EF0 for ; Tue, 10 May 2016 21:49:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm0-f47.google.com with SMTP id a17so50885631wme.0 for ; Tue, 10 May 2016 14:49:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=t7cp73EFRPyF6cgvvCvTaEypNLZtFhzZzPi4zFpoCUA=; b=qQatXDqJVL90CexFDOeQwyaQZf5Ttahgycx55V2amokDOBa+ZMVdwV7i4m78ZQX3Tz UKJvFmqP5/N1l3h21sX1fOztJDdusply10YBIL+NZhOUIk/ugJX3ZIRHpVAHrRkLqpDE PLmeXFFNXKyZQp37V5qz3HazSfomPSt8u3wHDp+KZOKlZiqTkyyTmgzdrTRkKZMhocyF aHqZGxVIq48dHohnUsvozB+Yj7oLuIZyTjxfamiEYXZHRwrjw2pG5RttV2SjVc37k2BH WqoqO4X3Ypi+J6lpZ59m4JriPe5QEDzo5b8N4jot8oM1UUCV0HoYiTpKOj2RI/74ROUR yRKQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=t7cp73EFRPyF6cgvvCvTaEypNLZtFhzZzPi4zFpoCUA=; b=WRtl6V6m6yrgvvTiOGqggPEkgXE7yuBAUqhcMXXOOeXiZrt2e+jQENkVq54QmfTLNi qL1YBS++zZuzNN8qEMiquwJ21yH2i+NXW+VUDPUl94vnSJSeCW4c8kpw8ExK3FA4KVJA lXc6a8jWYorxeGhILceghXErkPUNmONBu0Qzjd+/FfcIW+duXnUee3QrxLfldUc0061O 6yCZNuwqBY4ZYwAICH79s34f6vHOWbWnmxgHWsoMk26SPQgpXZ5ETcrqDVtB8i3XrwY+ iWKa1RGrCQu3qJQroqsAyKVe7HJ5yP6M3ALFizM+xsilRUQ83gG4HOxFKzZ4/10aYBW6 hglQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FVY2MqsTjP0+tgz6l9vlKMRUnDxWCi6Sa+HlNwncqb9ZEgJNqhJn+piz4TQwFIi5F76VP2nsqceUFNoTg== X-Received: by 10.28.127.80 with SMTP id a77mr401201wmd.66.1462916984723; Tue, 10 May 2016 14:49:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.28.216.131 with HTTP; Tue, 10 May 2016 14:49:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20160510185728.GA1149@fedora-21-dvm> References: <20160510185728.GA1149@fedora-21-dvm> From: Marco Pontello Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 23:49:25 +0200 Message-ID: To: Peter Todd , Bitcoin Protocol Discussion Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114155ac35df81053283e712 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Making AsicBoost irrelevant X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 21:49:46 -0000 --001a114155ac35df81053283e712 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 8:57 PM, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > As part of the hard-fork proposed in the HK agreement(1) we'd like to make > the > patented AsicBoost optimisation useless, and hopefully make further similar > optimizations useless as well. > Just in the interest of clarity, I think you should clarify who you are including in the "we". Bye! --001a114155ac35df81053283e712 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On T= ue, May 10, 2016 at 8:57 PM, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev &= lt;bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
As part of the hard-fork proposed in the HK agreement= (1) we'd like to make the
patented AsicBoost optimisation useless, and hopefully make further similar=
optimizations useless as well.

Just in the intere= st of clarity, I think you should clarify who you are including in the &quo= t;we".

Bye!

--001a114155ac35df81053283e712--