Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7BF890 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 07:59:49 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-qk0-f178.google.com (mail-qk0-f178.google.com [209.85.220.178]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D42EE4 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 07:59:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qkbl190 with SMTP id l190so24200701qkb.2 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 00:59:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=nAI3vmqbok1PX8uX2Vv8IuxaOKQofQwPuOLNNUfYKWQ=; b=J91a5NM/fFRK7yN2sHzKP22Ew5mfJUAJ/MiY4zLl7oD4wJqtiXhIYG2rQZRNbFW+Dl Yee0lwjqaMOIp7lM2R+4oITlCm1zMnwS4OZ2CdK3qWbzsNF/RFGHx3mS2jdcHkEKXmqx bp2JcCGQ/agChBSvitepj6C1bHXj6TW+veVdzM1BCS7loC/MwwdAcGRH9wsEi0apcBkO QxkOGP6jaZeuM33UT+yLJUu32nAtRNimnkpkfXGC9K3dVBsW9caHMhMerA5C/OavWVZM CH0z0/SbLPxOCCdFQSXhN85hI3i2gaNchUwCxsJ2sSGbbJ73Syo1avovc+yF5xBfB8az aFVQ== X-Received: by 10.140.17.41 with SMTP id 38mr9266431qgc.55.1445414388286; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 00:59:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.83.167 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 00:59:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <984D5FD5-9871-43FC-BD44-5F2E6EFD0671@toom.im> References: <99C42DE7-814A-48F8-AB28-A5ADD77A9FD9@toom.im> <20151014093913.GB19607@amethyst.visucore.com> <1FE17DEB-8F77-4A60-A644-46A4F97D0E24@toom.im> <984D5FD5-9871-43FC-BD44-5F2E6EFD0671@toom.im> From: Ross Bennetts Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 18:59:28 +1100 Message-ID: To: bitcoin-xt@googlegroups.com, bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c0bab82adacf052298c3bf X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, WEIRD_PORT autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Memory leaks? X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 07:59:49 -0000 --001a11c0bab82adacf052298c3bf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 2:01 PM, Jonathan Toomim wrote: > 3. One user on the bitcointalk p2pool thread ( > https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=18313.msg12733791#msg12733791) > claimed that he had this memory usage issue on Linux, but not on Mac OS X, > under a GBT workload in both situations. > > Thanks for the thorough investigation. FYI, I believe I've experienced this issue on both Linux & Mac OSX. I've moved my P2Pool/bitcoind node (rossbennetts.com:9332) from Ubuntu to OSX since my P2Pool instability began and they both seem to become flaky after a few hours of uptime (since ~v0.10.something). I've tried both core and xt. Two other bitcoin nodes, one connected to electrum-server and one standalone, seem fine. //long term lurker, first time poster... Ross... -- Ross M. W. Bennetts https://rossbennetts.com/ E-mail: ross.bennetts@gmail.com Twitter: https://twitter.com/rmwb/ Flickr: https://flickr.com/photos/rmwb/ Instagram: https://instagram.com/rmwb/ Facebook: https://facebook.com/ross.bennetts --001a11c0bab82adacf052298c3bf Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 2:01 PM, Jonathan Toomim <j@toom.im<= /a>> wrote:
3. One = user on the bitcointalk p2pool thread (https://b= itcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3D18313.msg12733791#msg12733791) claimed= that he had this memory usage issue on Linux, but not on Mac OS X, under a= GBT workload in both situations.


Thanks for the thorough investigation.
FYI,= I believe I've experienced this issue on both Linux & Mac OSX.
I've moved my P2Pool/bitcoind node (rossbennetts.com:9332) from Ubuntu to OSX since my P2Pool = instability began and they both seem to become flaky after a few hours of u= ptime (since ~v0.10.something). I've tried both core and xt.
= Two other bitcoin nodes, one connected to electrum-server and one standalon= e, seem fine.

//long term lurker, first time poste= r...
=C2=A0 =C2=A0Ross...
<= br>
--
--001a11c0bab82adacf052298c3bf--