Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2022 16:18:10 +0000
To: Dario Sneidermanis <dario@muun.com>,
 Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
From: Pieter Wuille <bitcoin-dev@wuille.net>
Message-ID: <dM4QYbBYzzlSUgR4vscZ4juWcSYB_BfGztt4EdOHRGjC7tZXp0lvuP6ej29RCJSTEH9F9lH4rvapKEfVzvjXIyZRHzO5ag5RZWnLLayWIvo=@wuille.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAKiPDnQzJBZ6cCRCFM7j01cNz=BcU_-_AcTh3jVo-Metpnek3w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKiPDnTPyduCm2Db0v51m_hbCSGbZcUcCwg9=hwJGKeiFeTWBg@mail.gmail.com>
 <1ee5a4e7ecffa0f638bbd45b195ecca6@dtrt.org>
 <CAKiPDnQzJBZ6cCRCFM7j01cNz=BcU_-_AcTh3jVo-Metpnek3w@mail.gmail.com>
Feedback-ID: 19463299:user:proton
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Opt-in full-RBF] Zero-conf apps in immediate
	danger
Precedence: list

On Friday, October 7th, 2022 at 5:37 PM, Dario Sneidermanis via bitcoin-dev=
 <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:


> Hello David,
>=20
> Thanks for the fast answer! It seems I missed the link to the PR, sorry f=
or the
> confusion. I'm referring to the opt-in flag for full-RBF from #25353
> (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25353).

Hello Dario,

It is not clear to me why you believe the merging of this particular pull r=
equest poses an immediate risk to you.

As explained by others, it's only a configuration option that is default of=
f, and the possibility of running rull-RBF policy nodes on the network have=
 been trivial for anyone who wanted to for a long time on the network.

I don't want to sound dismissive of your concerns, but at this point I'm no=
t convinced you're actually aware of what this PR does and doesn't do.

Cheers,

--=20
Pieter