Return-Path: Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F69DC000D for ; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 11:56:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B1E2404CA for ; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 11:56:57 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.097 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: smtp4.osuosl.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gazeta.pl Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wMQvM8AzQL6y for ; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 11:56:56 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: delayed 00:05:02 by SQLgrey-1.8.0 Received: from smtpo79.poczta.onet.pl (smtpo79.poczta.onet.pl [141.105.16.29]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30393404B5 for ; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 11:56:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pmq4v.m5r2.onet (pmq4v.m5r2.onet [10.174.32.70]) by smtp.poczta.onet.pl (Onet) with ESMTP id 4HW4PF4mpmzljCvp; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 13:51:45 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gazeta.pl; s=2013; t=1634298706; bh=/XaT8qxamf1MxUcRKPD9cW0KfsxjoC6HJWIzDI1rNlE=; h=From:To:In-Reply-To:Date:Subject:From; b=kjMyvS45FQmYjZW1VWXh+/b8p8iwthC7e9Zvkaor4unffYf5jfZT7bf0fHHMiebMS lU9Y+SZP11bdQUYrLqyFdhXdSFFZg3CZCjDOrfozT3/3aTV1an+HCTrVAqVjrs2L8/ lVgej9nbVYFLSjMsDYSUSw0P3zAYGTLPgqEgl6AE= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received: from [82.177.167.2] by pmq4v.m5r2.onet via HTTP id ; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 13:51:45 +0200 From: vjudeu@gazeta.pl X-Priority: 3 To: Anthony Towns , Pieter Wuille , Bitcoin Protocol Discussion In-Reply-To: <20211015010512.GC6451@erisian.com.au> Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 13:51:45 +0200 Message-Id: <143779041-18cce0a32a943cfd46965c00b6634d22@pmq4v.m5r2.onet> X-Mailer: onet.poczta X-Onet-PMQ: ;82.177.167.2;PL;3 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 22:48:22 +0000 Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Taproot testnet wallet X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 11:56:57 -0000 On 2021-10-15 03:05:36 user Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev wrote: > Same stuff works with testnet, though I'm not sure if any testnet faucets will accept bech32m addresses directly. There are faucets that accept such addresses, for example https://bitcoinfa= ucet.uo1.net/, but you have to use bech32 checksum instead of bech32m, for = example sending to tb1p84x2ryuyfevgnlpnxt9f39gm7r68gwtvllxqe5w2n5ru00s9aqus= 27cytz works fine, but sending to tb1p84x2ryuyfevgnlpnxt9f39gm7r68gwtvllxqe= 5w2n5ru00s9aquslzggwq does not work. The same with pages like mempool.space= , you have to use bech32 instead of bech32m, then you can send to taproot f= rom some old faucets or browse taproot addresses from some old block explor= ers.