Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from <voisine@gmail.com>) id 1Z4uHs-0001Zw-P6 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 16 Jun 2015 17:04:36 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.220.174 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.220.174; envelope-from=voisine@gmail.com; helo=mail-qk0-f174.google.com; Received: from mail-qk0-f174.google.com ([209.85.220.174]) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1Z4uHr-0005xn-NG for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 16 Jun 2015 17:04:36 +0000 Received: by qkdm188 with SMTP id m188so12252597qkd.1 for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>; Tue, 16 Jun 2015 10:04:30 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.55.25.40 with SMTP id k40mr3503790qkh.30.1434474270322; Tue, 16 Jun 2015 10:04:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.91.37 with HTTP; Tue, 16 Jun 2015 10:04:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <e471f72fdba349d0a6d66f1c8772f6e8@riseup.net> References: <CALqxMTHrnSS9MGgKO-5+=fVhiOOvk12Recs11S0PcSUxQT1wdQ@mail.gmail.com> <CA+c4Zoy6U9RXH3Qw15sXXnaeYL-9PFbnTp=VLAJsvpC_zoAK_A@mail.gmail.com> <CAEY8wq41ftFA1ObyUWiRGOgebwqDCAw_j+hU6_wfcXv5GSZaJw@mail.gmail.com> <201506160341.10994.luke@dashjr.org> <CAEY8wq4SOddGUJNqkrdhhfQEn4tXehCWiifk-P=PYUdfFcXFTQ@mail.gmail.com> <a9e2e033c786fb7f99bcf7505ad45f21@riseup.net> <CACq0ZD5uYikAfVuep8XCgEs-53NbF-SYhvm4qneZsEQdgd=6rw@mail.gmail.com> <e471f72fdba349d0a6d66f1c8772f6e8@riseup.net> Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 10:04:30 -0700 Message-ID: <CACq0ZD5y-yeiqqTu4sq0MZ2Ta=Xd_t0eOHg9PTfyg=XgVoF-Ag@mail.gmail.com> From: Aaron Voisine <voisine@gmail.com> To: "justusranvier@riseup.net" <justusranvier@riseup.net> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1147eb8c52752c0518a59134 X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (voisine[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1Z4uHr-0005xn-NG Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net> Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] The Bitcoin Node Market X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development> List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net> List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 17:04:36 -0000 --001a1147eb8c52752c0518a59134 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 With their money, if they were to take advantage of optional additional financial services, like, as one example, comsumer protection insurance. Aaron On Tuesday, June 16, 2015, <justusranvier@riseup.net> wrote: > On 2015-06-16 07:55, Aaron Voisine wrote: > >> Suppose a billion mobile phones wanted to run SPV wallets tomorrow. Who >>> would provide the nodes they would need connect to? >>> >> >> The SPV wallet author would if they wanted their wallet to function. >> > > How will the SPV wallet users pay for this service? With their money, or > with their privacy? > -- Aaron Voisine co-founder and CEO breadwallet.com --001a1147eb8c52752c0518a59134 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable With their money, if they were to take advantage of optional additional fin= ancial services, like, as one example, comsumer protection insurance.<div><= br></div><div>Aaron<span></span><br><br>On Tuesday, June 16, 2015, <<a = href=3D"mailto:justusranvier@riseup.net">justusranvier@riseup.net</a>> w= rote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;borde= r-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">On 2015-06-16 07:55, Aaron Voisine = wrote:<br> <blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p= x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"m= argin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> Suppose a billion mobile phones wanted to run SPV wallets tomorrow. Who<br> would provide the nodes they would need connect to?<br> </blockquote> <br> The SPV wallet author would if they wanted their wallet to function.<br> </blockquote> <br> How will the SPV wallet users pay for this service? With their money, or wi= th their privacy?<br> </blockquote></div><br><br>-- <br><div dir=3D"ltr"><div><div dir=3D"ltr"><d= iv><br>Aaron Voisine</div><div>co-founder and CEO<br><a href=3D"http://brea= dwallet.com" target=3D"_blank">breadwallet.com</a></div></div></div></div><= br> --001a1147eb8c52752c0518a59134--