Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Z4uHs-0001Zw-P6 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 16 Jun 2015 17:04:36 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.220.174 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.220.174; envelope-from=voisine@gmail.com; helo=mail-qk0-f174.google.com; Received: from mail-qk0-f174.google.com ([209.85.220.174]) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1Z4uHr-0005xn-NG for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 16 Jun 2015 17:04:36 +0000 Received: by qkdm188 with SMTP id m188so12252597qkd.1 for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2015 10:04:30 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.55.25.40 with SMTP id k40mr3503790qkh.30.1434474270322; Tue, 16 Jun 2015 10:04:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.91.37 with HTTP; Tue, 16 Jun 2015 10:04:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <201506160341.10994.luke@dashjr.org> Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 10:04:30 -0700 Message-ID: From: Aaron Voisine To: "justusranvier@riseup.net" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1147eb8c52752c0518a59134 X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (voisine[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1Z4uHr-0005xn-NG Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] The Bitcoin Node Market X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 17:04:36 -0000 --001a1147eb8c52752c0518a59134 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 With their money, if they were to take advantage of optional additional financial services, like, as one example, comsumer protection insurance. Aaron On Tuesday, June 16, 2015, wrote: > On 2015-06-16 07:55, Aaron Voisine wrote: > >> Suppose a billion mobile phones wanted to run SPV wallets tomorrow. Who >>> would provide the nodes they would need connect to? >>> >> >> The SPV wallet author would if they wanted their wallet to function. >> > > How will the SPV wallet users pay for this service? With their money, or > with their privacy? > -- Aaron Voisine co-founder and CEO breadwallet.com --001a1147eb8c52752c0518a59134 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable With their money, if they were to take advantage of optional additional fin= ancial services, like, as one example, comsumer protection insurance.
<= br>
Aaron

On Tuesday, June 16, 2015, <justusranvier@riseup.net> w= rote:
On 2015-06-16 07:55, Aaron Voisine = wrote:
Suppose a billion mobile phones wanted to run SPV wallets tomorrow. Who
would provide the nodes they would need connect to?

The SPV wallet author would if they wanted their wallet to function.

How will the SPV wallet users pay for this service? With their money, or wi= th their privacy?


--

Aaron Voisine
co-founder and CEO
breadwallet.com
<= br> --001a1147eb8c52752c0518a59134--