Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.214.169 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.214.169; envelope-from=mh.in.england@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-ob0-f169.google.com; 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: mh.in.england@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <CANAnSg0iE_ZdbXbkBwsafUJ6_ck4jETQM0o0RY-0am-o7=6Xbg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20140106120338.GA14918@savin>
	<op.w9c5o7vgyldrnw@laptop-air.hsd1.ca.comcast.net>
	<20140110102037.GB25749@savin>
	<op.w9kkxcityldrnw@laptop-air.hsd1.ca.comcast.net>
	<CABsx9T2G=yqSUGr0+Ju5-z9P++uS20AwLC+c3DnFMHtcQjQK6w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAS2fgTz0TaGhym_35V3N2-vHVzU9BeuV8q+QJjwh5bg77FEZg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANEZrP0huBWqgvQik9Yc26Tu4CwR0VSXcfC+qfzsZqvoU4VJGA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20140113133746.GI38964@giles.gnomon.org.uk>
	<CANEZrP1KAVhi_-cxCYe0rR9LUSYJ8MyW8=6eSJZ65FeY5ZJNuQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20140114225321.GT38964@giles.gnomon.org.uk>
	<CANAnSg0tH_bK_19rsRRHOeZgrGYeWMhW89fXPyS4DQGmS4r_7A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALimQCXgc0eXeOcqFGUaCpSF7gKEe87KzvLqHZwUysV3WyjjGw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAS2fgShChAQryfUOBp60jB-zxn2tH986fu1HfT+LsNdBYnoYg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJHLa0P5r2+kxy7w8G=h=TAhdk1jUoW5UOiv-euo47uQY0u9ZA@mail.gmail.com>
	<op.w9q6jdsayldrnw@laptop-air.hsd1.ca.comcast.net>
	<CANAnSg0iE_ZdbXbkBwsafUJ6_ck4jETQM0o0RY-0am-o7=6Xbg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 11:19:41 +0100
Message-ID: <CANEZrP1UKHwvaeqb9wCHXqkyUCp5x772_GfVuZOSkM+ccnKP1A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net>
To: Drak <drak@zikula.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e013a18227726cb04f013c3f1
Cc: "bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net"
	<bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Stealth Addresses
Precedence: list

--089e013a18227726cb04f013c3f1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

I think we have a winner in "reusable address". Yes an existing address can
be reused and will superficially appear to work, it just won't work well.
Calling them reusable addresses helps reinforce the idea in peoples mind
that the other kind shouldn't be reused.


On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Drak <drak@zikula.org> wrote:

> On 16 January 2014 00:05, Jeremy Spilman <jeremy@taplink.co> wrote:
>
>>  Might I propose "reusable address".
>>
>> I think that describes it best to any non-programmer, and even more so
>> encourages wallets to present options as 'one time use' vs 'reusable'.
>>
>
> The problem is all addresses are reusable and to an average user,
> addresses are already reusable so there is little to distinguish the
> address format.
> It might be better to call it a "public address" in common terminology.
>
> Drak
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services.
> Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For
> Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between.
> Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today.
>
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>
>

--089e013a18227726cb04f013c3f1
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">I think we have a winner in &quot;reusable address&quot;. =
Yes an existing address can be reused and will superficially appear to work=
, it just won&#39;t work well. Calling them reusable addresses helps reinfo=
rce the idea in peoples mind that the other kind shouldn&#39;t be reused.</=
div>
<div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Thu, Jan 1=
6, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Drak <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:drak@ziku=
la.org" target=3D"_blank">drak@zikula.org</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockqu=
ote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc s=
olid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div=
 class=3D"im">On 16 January 2014 00:05, Jeremy Spilman <span dir=3D"ltr">&l=
t;<a href=3D"mailto:jeremy@taplink.co" target=3D"_blank">jeremy@taplink.co<=
/a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-=
left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;p=
adding-left:1ex">

<u></u>


<div><div>Might I propose &quot;reusable address&quot;.<br><br>I think that=
 describes it best to any non-programmer, and even more so encourages walle=
ts to present options as &#39;one time use&#39; vs &#39;reusable&#39;.</div=
>


</div></blockquote><div><br></div></div><div>The problem is all addresses a=
re reusable and to an average user, addresses are already reusable so there=
 is little to distinguish the address format.</div><div>It might be better =
to call it a &quot;public address&quot; in common terminology.</div>
<span class=3D"HOEnZb"><font color=3D"#888888">

<div><br></div><div>Drak<br></div><div>=C2=A0</div></font></span></div></di=
v></div>
<br>-----------------------------------------------------------------------=
-------<br>
CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services.<br>
Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For<br>
Critical Workloads, Development Environments &amp; Everything In Between.<b=
r>
Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today.<br>
<a href=3D"http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=3D119420431&amp;iu=
=3D/4140/ostg.clktrk" target=3D"_blank">http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gam=
pad/clk?id=3D119420431&amp;iu=3D/4140/ostg.clktrk</a><br>__________________=
_____________________________<br>

Bitcoin-development mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net">Bitcoin-develo=
pment@lists.sourceforge.net</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development=
" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-de=
velopment</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>

--089e013a18227726cb04f013c3f1--