Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 15:25:46 -0700
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: Chris Pacia <ctpacia@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20150821222545.GE7450@muck>
References: <55D6AD19.10305@mattcorallo.com>
	<CADm_WcZJEe4fz4dLYKeOzC0CWbM=-o92BvEF0qiGvNwyMjrEiA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20150821055534.GA27259@muck>
	<CADm_WcanqF7oHn7huKuYP8iFWmY4XE58tG01M_Nqg9qx6YFu9A@mail.gmail.com>
	<20150821060716.GA31674@muck>
	<CAB+qUq5H1Ggzgdc-X7CPAz9orhMgPgQc4_G8TdC-oeSr174p1A@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="HB4mHL4PVvkpZAgW"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAB+qUq5H1Ggzgdc-X7CPAz9orhMgPgQc4_G8TdC-oeSr174p1A@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Revisiting NODE_BLOOM: Proposed BIP
Precedence: list


--HB4mHL4PVvkpZAgW
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 06:15:16PM -0400, Chris Pacia wrote:
> On Aug 21, 2015 2:07 AM, "Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev" <
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>=20
> > Also, as I mentioned, just look at the popularity of wallets such as
> > Mycelium that are not adopting bloom filters, but going with SPV
> > verification of block headers w/ lookup servers.
>=20
> Related I recently had a conversation with a Mycelium employee who told me
> they were considering moving to spv/bloom because of the server issues
> Andreas mentioned.
>=20
> I don't know any more about their plans, but I wouldn't assume the above
> statement to be correct.

That'd be a foolish design decision to move exclusively over; their
wallet was safe to use during the recent fork, unlike Android Wallet,
precisely because of their existing design.

In any case, regardless of whether we're wrong about the popularity
issue, I've yet to see any issues raised with implementing NODE_BLOOM
that will adversely affect such wallets - we've certainly got no
shortage of node capacity to go around.

--=20
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
00000000000000000402fe6fb9ad613c93e12bddfc6ec02a2bd92f002050594d

--HB4mHL4PVvkpZAgW
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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==
=KuAX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--HB4mHL4PVvkpZAgW--