Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4AED41DFC for ; Mon, 5 Oct 2015 16:39:54 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from smtp10.hushmail.com (smtp10.hushmail.com [65.39.178.143]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2D6EEC for ; Mon, 5 Oct 2015 16:39:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp10.hushmail.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp10.hushmail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 9C214C01D9 for ; Mon, 5 Oct 2015 16:39:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=hush.com; h=date:to:subject:from; s=hush; bh=J4Iu0cQaasC3Ex0j3x6QwsSq68pZ0f99+4iOu35o5d8=; b=XaP5NH8B8KI2Nx2SQaHH0vyIJVpCrETTOnriSuANjCrulVK6gfSRBAJ0cynVHCMOi+7PiPlB/0U7QQ4yPxUUUKo1JwRA5fUZ3hk55g2/3Q/LoSW8+Yw8FGjox2PSqqpyOUFP6lcYEUimmXQKzlH3a/8wyOR/4UePkBlE4tQOtNv/fVGFoQgc4XqUouFkPDZbEz9ZYh43rxZpzcddLB2dXWaGPMtocyi5x7rZ9629rD9HED3pBAMFdzm113ybLGVi2HEaA93UT8HTeidZu1h56kZA2kGLFoynB8Xd13ZvMRitIOtYVIwNgfzH0MNRulr5MCMtwJvp93SQfHbMKUsFzA== Received: from smtp.hushmail.com (w1.hushmail.com [65.39.178.83]) by smtp10.hushmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 5 Oct 2015 16:39:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.hushmail.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id 5BA1420106; Mon, 5 Oct 2015 16:39:53 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2015 19:39:53 +0300 To: "Sergio Demian Lerner" , "bitcoin-dev" From: "NxtChg" In-Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Message-Id: <20151005163953.5BA1420106@smtp.hushmail.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] =?utf-8?q?This_thread_is_not_about_the_soft/hard_fo?= =?utf-8?q?rk_technical=09debate?= X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2015 16:39:54 -0000 >I just think Mike Hearn has won this battle. Unless the Core camp isn't concerned with credibility because they see XT as a disruptive attack. So it's very easy to justify banning a single individual in the name of "restoring peace and order". We've already seen such suggestion. Peter R was banned on /r/bitcoin, Mike was banned on IRC. The new governance model seems to be "consensus by exclusion".