Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 12:05:23 +0200 (CEST)
From: Prayank <prayank@tutanota.de>
To: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Message-ID: <M_eKbLz--N-2@tutanota.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
 boundary="----=_Part_309630_1379337001.1620986724589"
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Fee estimates and RBF
Precedence: list

------=_Part_309630_1379337001.1620986724589
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I have shared response by Jeremy and ZmnSCPxj in an answer to=C2=A0https://=
bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/105860/what-are-we-trying-to-predict-in=
-fee-estimation-and-why

Also find the recent CVE related to RBF by Antoine Riard and implementation=
 of RBF in Bitcoin Core compared to btcd interesting. Even though I am not =
sure why inherited signalling is not implemented in Bitcoin Core.
RBF, CPFP and their combinations are something that is less explored IMO. F=
or example: I had discussed one usecase of CPFP with Harding in IRC once in=
 which a project uses maker-taker model. Maker broadcasts transaction with =
1 sat/vByte and taker has to confirm this transaction by creating a child t=
ransaction with an effective fee rate according to mempool stats. Basically=
, the idea of receiver paying for the transaction instead of sender. But it=
 will involve lot of exception handling.
--=20
Prayank
------=_Part_309630_1379337001.1620986724589
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv=3D"content-type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3DUTF-8=
">
  </head>
  <body>
<div>I have shared response by Jeremy and ZmnSCPxj in an answer to&nbsp;<a =
href=3D"https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/105860/what-are-we-tryi=
ng-to-predict-in-fee-estimation-and-why">https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/=
questions/105860/what-are-we-trying-to-predict-in-fee-estimation-and-why</a=
><br></div><div><br></div><div>Also find the recent CVE related to RBF by A=
ntoine Riard and implementation of RBF in Bitcoin Core compared to btcd int=
eresting. Even though I am not sure why inherited signalling is not impleme=
nted in Bitcoin Core.</div><div><br></div><div>RBF, CPFP and their combinat=
ions are something that is less explored IMO. For example: I had discussed =
one usecase of CPFP with Harding in IRC once in which a project uses maker-=
taker model. Maker broadcasts transaction with 1 sat/vByte and taker has to=
 confirm this transaction by creating a child transaction with an effective=
 fee rate according to mempool stats. Basically, the idea of receiver payin=
g for the transaction instead of sender. But it will involve lot of excepti=
on handling.</div><div><br></div><div>-- <br></div><div>Prayank</div>  </bo=
dy>
</html>

------=_Part_309630_1379337001.1620986724589--