Return-Path: <roconnor@blockstream.io> Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65B377A4 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 01:35:02 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-io1-f50.google.com (mail-io1-f50.google.com [209.85.166.50]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14F76826 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 01:35:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-io1-f50.google.com with SMTP id x4so275025ion.2 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 18:35:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=blockstream.io; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=gL/PRwlN3Fvs3wo7DA0yCdNyD7yERmE9VNLFX0+QS3k=; b=OEGtazZtm1h8lVMS3tyKx6DmRqcqUlJfIjU7jZJVTrUKZ8QLv0oO9EsWTk+ShH4YIH 39ukxnCZ87hR6uJNzKn8ABRY/DptrQVH0EdAh7dwHrX9n885HrlNsY54rJ+MTSbANjyI 0jniVb7ty2fAWp1Sqx1CNz5lJeQJtdwllr1EI= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=gL/PRwlN3Fvs3wo7DA0yCdNyD7yERmE9VNLFX0+QS3k=; b=lrPWKmckC6Uo6AN97fJ8jD/dtn8Md7a6LrFy95TsQVSpHgy1pk9c74Jp04MXV8AZv9 TGaZKH+UcNo4wt9BaEzSoH36Hj0O2bz/0UqkCgsQQp2OeB4sh4fI4LBBYkGGPobDx5QW H+9Js+cCC1Q2XADy4t4xMibmzfF5xgbZUzj0IaangTLg2HSbgKJnV9kFWY8W65aq0Q5O k551F0QCaDntMLZkURSJwgdj9oT1hvxDh2HdIKwYnlIKg5BK4YpMps/SLIq6EqfImd0I hzDE+9ubBF0nY0ge5BuSo8WsJd5su7EM06EneN+v4PBPDY+NPVpW79JD1qychSrpYgQh nUSg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXxKNYEs8rFw9VjcPD7eXJ8e4s9e/QuHAiDm36YZ+P3GZe2wX3K 077eFhBIL+c3BECea6qm+mFbeBVmceSnI+9FTyBGkg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzmkon0UOZhIYA+BurVk3ymoqiSgPXMgHGB9kNvFIenC0ZPdvuKspsrpr45i4vp+J4eW/Y+1o/LXfywzg4G9bE= X-Received: by 2002:a6b:7b08:: with SMTP id l8mr10442009iop.33.1552440901343; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 18:35:01 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <bf96c2fb-2e2e-a47f-e59f-87e56d83eca3@mattcorallo.com> <CAMZUoK=1kgZLR1YZ+cJgzwmEOwrABYFs=2Ri=xGX=BCr+w=VQw@mail.gmail.com> <6bb308f5-f478-d5ec-064f-e4972709f29c@mattcorallo.com> <CAMZUoKk3CgatSexAHRuxn3ibCYwgHpTkc0gF0yDi6hLAVcCiNA@mail.gmail.com> <db3405ef-7e06-9538-0700-df37abaa602d@mattcorallo.com> <CAMZUoKnK2YhucaJ-1HxH3MXeBtQZebV+h_rcS5Oq=yCMDC5u7A@mail.gmail.com> <88C160CE-F2CE-4D6E-BA1F-40E219A1659E@mattcorallo.com> <CAAUaCyixU14z-ym6s62b_BDn2c4TL9jEk-Fa7VwPeNWPm9SPbg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAAUaCyixU14z-ym6s62b_BDn2c4TL9jEk-Fa7VwPeNWPm9SPbg@mail.gmail.com> From: "Russell O'Connor" <roconnor@blockstream.io> Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 21:34:50 -0400 Message-ID: <CAMZUoKmZ8DQ5g3nmp7YiDp41V10pLYL6o8u0Foms5hG65M==UQ@mail.gmail.com> To: Jacob Eliosoff <jacob.eliosoff@gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000075d3210583efd08a" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 06:46:23 +0000 Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] OP_CODESEPARATOR Re: BIP Proposal: The Great Consensus Cleanup X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/> List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 01:35:02 -0000 --00000000000075d3210583efd08a Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 6:39 PM Jacob Eliosoff <jacob.eliosoff@gmail.com> wrote: > Also, if future disabling isn't the point of making a tx type like > OP_CODESEPARATOR non-standard - what is? If we're committed to indefinite > support of these oddball features, what do we gain by making them hard to > use/mine? > The purpose of making OP_CODESEPARATOR non-standard was to partly mitigate the risk of the vulnerability that OP_CODESEPARATOR induces while we consider how to patch it. > --00000000000075d3210583efd08a Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"ltr"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"g= mail_attr">On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 6:39 PM Jacob Eliosoff <<a href=3D"ma= ilto:jacob.eliosoff@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">jacob.eliosoff@gmail.com</= a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0p= x 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><d= iv dir=3D"auto">Also, if future disabling isn't the point of making a t= x type like OP_CODESEPARATOR non-standard - what is?=C2=A0 If we're com= mitted to indefinite support of these oddball features, what do we gain by = making them hard to use/mine?</div></blockquote><div><br></div><div><div>Th= e purpose of making OP_CODESEPARATOR non-standard=20 was to partly mitigate the risk of the vulnerability that OP_CODESEPARATOR = induces while we=20 consider how to patch it.</div><div><div></div></div></div><blockquote clas= s=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid r= gb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"> </blockquote></div></div> --00000000000075d3210583efd08a--