MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20150627121505.6E857417EC@smtp.hushmail.com>
References: <CAPg+sBjOj9eXiDG0F6G54SVKkStF_1HRu2wzGqtFF5X_NAWy4w@mail.gmail.com>
	<20150627074259.GA25420@amethyst.visucore.com>
	<CABm2gDr3orTHMN1q8vGmy3NpXWPy5i=zHhGneDGUk=ney3-e+Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<20150627120935.GD25420@amethyst.visucore.com>
	<20150627121505.6E857417EC@smtp.hushmail.com>
From: Greg Sanders <gsanders87@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2015 08:17:39 -0400
Message-ID: <CAB3F3Ds=_DG0Z75gmMPWJ=YWga61s7zkL+dkhVkuzTqCg6zf_w@mail.gmail.com>
To: NxtChg <nxtchg@hush.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bacbbccec18c905197ed82e
Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] The need for larger blocks
Precedence: list

--047d7bacbbccec18c905197ed82e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I_know_it_when_I_see_it

Can we agree n-1 dev Nacks would be a controversial hard fork?

Greg

On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 8:15 AM, NxtChg <nxtchg@hush.com> wrote:

>
> On 6/27/2015 at 3:09 PM, "Wladimir J. van der Laan" <laanwj@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >Not sure though. The only way to find out is to propose them and see.
> Maybe wait a bit until things have cooled down...
>
> And then we are again at the mercy of a single "decider" to judge whether
> something is controversial or not?
>
> It was pointed several times before that with enough loud minority you can
> make any change seem controversial.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>

--047d7bacbbccec18c905197ed82e
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><a href=3D"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I_know_it_when_I_=
see_it">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I_know_it_when_I_see_it</a>=C2=A0<br>=
<div><br></div><div>Can we agree n-1 dev Nacks would be a controversial har=
d fork?=C2=A0</div></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br clear=3D"all"><div>=
<div class=3D"gmail_signature">Greg</div></div>
<br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 8:15 AM, NxtChg <spa=
n dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:nxtchg@hush.com" target=3D"_blank">nxtc=
hg@hush.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" styl=
e=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span c=
lass=3D""><br>
On 6/27/2015 at 3:09 PM, &quot;Wladimir J. van der Laan&quot; &lt;<a href=
=3D"mailto:laanwj@gmail.com">laanwj@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
<br>
&gt;Not sure though. The only way to find out is to propose them and see. M=
aybe wait a bit until things have cooled down...<br>
<br>
</span>And then we are again at the mercy of a single &quot;decider&quot; t=
o judge whether something is controversial or not?<br>
<br>
It was pointed several times before that with enough loud minority you can =
make any change seem controversial.<br>
<div class=3D"HOEnZb"><div class=3D"h5"><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
bitcoin-dev mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoin-dev@lists.=
linuxfoundation.org</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev" =
rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mail=
man/listinfo/bitcoin-dev</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>

--047d7bacbbccec18c905197ed82e--