Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1XjEok-0008DG-Sv for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 22:00:42 +0000 X-ACL-Warn: Received: from bouvier.getmail.no ([84.210.184.8]) by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) id 1XjEoi-0007iw-Ui for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 22:00:42 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bouvier.getmail.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA52F407FE for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 23:00:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from bouvier.getmail.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bouvier.get.c.bitbit.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id eQwPAUZHg4Lp for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 23:00:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bouvier.getmail.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id D565B4076C for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 23:00:24 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at bouvier.get.c.bitbit.net Received: from bouvier.getmail.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bouvier.get.c.bitbit.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id KGPACXlLngRm for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 23:00:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from coldstorage.localnet (cm-84.208.97.23.getinternet.no [84.208.97.23]) by bouvier.getmail.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id B66534070A for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 23:00:24 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Zander To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 23:00:23 +0100 Message-ID: <2462434.74aohssIDn@coldstorage> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.1 (Linux/3.16-3-amd64; KDE/4.14.1; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. X-Headers-End: 1XjEoi-0007iw-Ui Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Fwd: death by halving X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 22:00:43 -0000 On Tuesday 28. October 2014 22.44.50 Ferdinando M. Ametrano wrote: > It amazes me that basic economic considerations seems completely lost here, > especially when it comes to mining. Please don't confuse people dismissing your thoughts with dismissing the basic economic considerations. The fact of the matter is that you didn't read the archives where these ideas have been brought forward and discussed, a consensus was reached. (it wasn't so basic afterall) The fact that people don't want to repeat the discussion just for your sake is not the same as people not listening to those arguments.