Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Yz4d1-0005bE-0B for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 31 May 2015 14:54:19 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.217.181 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.217.181; envelope-from=gavinandresen@gmail.com; helo=mail-lb0-f181.google.com; Received: from mail-lb0-f181.google.com ([209.85.217.181]) by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1Yz4cz-0008G7-5Z for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 31 May 2015 14:54:18 +0000 Received: by lbcue7 with SMTP id ue7so71307012lbc.0 for ; Sun, 31 May 2015 07:54:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.166.37 with SMTP id zd5mr16551004lbb.75.1433084050770; Sun, 31 May 2015 07:54:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.25.90.75 with HTTP; Sun, 31 May 2015 07:54:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <554BE0E1.5030001@bluematt.me> Date: Sun, 31 May 2015 10:54:10 -0400 Message-ID: From: Gavin Andresen To: Alex Mizrahi Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c382d0c7921f051761e13b X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (gavinandresen[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.0 AWL AWL: Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address X-Headers-End: 1Yz4cz-0008G7-5Z Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Fwd: Block Size Increase Requirements X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 May 2015 14:54:19 -0000 --001a11c382d0c7921f051761e13b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Alex Mizrahi wrote: > > >> That orphan rate increase will go to whoever is producing the 20MB >> blocks, NOT you. >> > > This depends on how miners are connected. > > E.g. suppose there are three miners, A and B have fast connectivity > between then, and C has a slow network. > Suppose that A miners a block and B receives it in 1 second. C receives it > in 6 seconds. > This means that blocks mined by C during these ~5 seconds will be orphaned > because B gets A's block first. > Yes, if you are on a slow network then you are at a (slight) disadvantage. So? There are lots of equations that go into the "is mining profitable" equation: cost of power, Internet cost and connectivity, cost of capital, access to technology other miners don't have, inexpensive labor or rent, inexpensive cooling, ability to use waste heat... That's good. An equation with lots of variables has lots of different maximum solutions, and that means better decentralization -- there is less likely to be one perfect place or way to mine. -- -- Gavin Andresen --001a11c382d0c7921f051761e13b Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On S= un, May 31, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Alex Mizrahi <alex.mizrahi@gmail.com= > wrote:
=C2= =A0
That orpha= n rate increase will go to whoever is producing the 20MB blocks, NOT you.

This depends = on how miners are connected.

E.g. suppose there ar= e three miners, A and B have fast connectivity between then, and C has a sl= ow network.
Suppose that A miners a block and B receives it in 1 = second. C receives it in 6 seconds.
This means that blocks mined = by C during these ~5 seconds will be orphaned because B gets A's block = first.

Yes, if you = are on a slow network then you are at a (slight) disadvantage. So?

There are lots of equations that go into the "is mini= ng profitable" equation: cost of power, Internet cost and connectivity= , cost of capital, access to technology other miners don't have, inexpe= nsive labor or rent, inexpensive cooling, ability to use waste heat...

That's good. An equation with lots of variables ha= s lots of different maximum solutions, and that means better decentralizati= on -- there is less likely to be one perfect place or way to mine.

--
--
Gavin Andrese= n
--001a11c382d0c7921f051761e13b--