Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <witchspace81@gmail.com>) id 1Qd4Xr-0003Mz-HC
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Sat, 02 Jul 2011 18:03:55 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.213.175 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.213.175; envelope-from=witchspace81@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-yx0-f175.google.com; 
Received: from mail-yx0-f175.google.com ([209.85.213.175])
	by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1Qd4Xq-0003K0-OG
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Sat, 02 Jul 2011 18:03:55 +0000
Received: by yxi19 with SMTP id 19so414124yxi.34
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Sat, 02 Jul 2011 11:03:49 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.151.8.21 with SMTP id l21mr441237ybi.186.1309629829297; Sat,
	02 Jul 2011 11:03:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.151.150.15 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Jul 2011 11:03:49 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <65026C81-A96E-490A-90D2-794A10C2A680@jrbobdobbs.org>
References: <CAJNQ0stvozeQAVFkduY7Ph5EXy8ayYwiu4T+6Oz1RwjgiDnBeA@mail.gmail.com>
	<201107021050.10563.luke@dashjr.org>
	<CAJNQ0svyJcob=gfWfi7YuLWTdbLokrFyDGnMFtYLRk_29r-DZw@mail.gmail.com>
	<1DBB0EED-7A9C-46AC-ABE2-6214ABD3FE9A@jrbobdobbs.org>
	<CAJNQ0su0jtaFz6abS+H24d7dqKoWkugct1yQLeVyXTgr0rkXXA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJNQ0stDg7qCxb8f-KjfP7k0RyM0dpHETkf==uswOzm4DstSUQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<65026C81-A96E-490A-90D2-794A10C2A680@jrbobdobbs.org>
Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2011 18:03:49 +0000
Message-ID: <CAJNQ0sv4i+wTQeGBmmfMpUL-mUB2a6KX1NddF2K4Lecs4ofuAA@mail.gmail.com>
From: John Smith <witchspace81@gmail.com>
To: Douglas Huff <dhuff@jrbobdobbs.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd514ccc337b704a719f4eb
X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(witchspace81[at]gmail.com)
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	0.1 FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT Envelope-from freemail username ends in
	digit (witchspace81[at]gmail.com)
	1.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
	author's domain
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1Qd4Xq-0003K0-OG
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Reconsider build system change?
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2011 18:03:55 -0000

--000e0cd514ccc337b704a719f4eb
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Douglas Huff <dhuff@jrbobdobbs.org> wrote:

> On Jul 2, 2011, at 12:31 PM, John Smith wrote:
> > So, what about native build script generation for other platforms?
> autotools can only generate makefiles (with at least two intermediate code
> generation steps), which is quite limited.
>
> This would be true if gmake didn't build/run basically everywhere; but, it
> does.
>

It doesn't for the native build systems on at least Windows and OSX. Yes,
you can get gmake to run, but it's a hack.


> I would say that's actually a mark against cmake. If you need a gui to
> select build options because your cli doesn't have proper help output
> something is wrong.
>

You don't need to use the UI. It's just a convenience. Command line can
simply be used if you want.


> If you're willing to setup and maintain a cmake build environment I
> wouldn't say it should be rejected outright. Speculating about it without an
> implementation to compare seems like a waste of time.
>

As I said in my opening post, there *is* a cmake build system implemented
for bitcoin.

JS

--000e0cd514ccc337b704a719f4eb
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Douglas Huff=
 <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:dhuff@jrbobdobbs.org">dhuff@jrbobd=
obbs.org</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=
=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class=3D"im">On Jul 2, 2011, at 12:31 PM, John Smith wrote:<br>
&gt; So, what about native build script generation for other platforms? aut=
otools can only generate makefiles (with at least two intermediate code gen=
eration steps), which is quite limited.<br>
<br>
</div>This would be true if gmake didn&#39;t build/run basically everywhere=
; but, it does.<br></blockquote><div><br>It doesn&#39;t for the native buil=
d systems on at least Windows and OSX. Yes, you can get gmake to run, but i=
t&#39;s a hack.<br>
=A0<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt=
 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">I wo=
uld say that&#39;s actually a mark against cmake. If you need a gui to sele=
ct build options because your cli doesn&#39;t have proper help output somet=
hing is wrong.<br>
</blockquote><div><br>You don&#39;t need to use the UI. It&#39;s just a con=
venience. Command line can simply be used if you want.<br>=A0<br></div><blo=
ckquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-le=
ft: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">

If you&#39;re willing to setup and maintain a cmake build environment I wou=
ldn&#39;t say it should be rejected outright. Speculating about it without =
an implementation to compare seems like a waste of time.<br></blockquote>
<div><br>As I said in my opening post, there *is* a cmake build system impl=
emented for bitcoin.=A0
<br><br>JS<br></div></div>

--000e0cd514ccc337b704a719f4eb--