Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1QXZ7q-0004By-T6 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 13:30:18 +0000 X-ACL-Warn: Received: from zinan.dashjr.org ([173.242.112.54]) by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) id 1QXZ7m-0007xD-3F for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 13:30:18 +0000 Received: from ishibashi.localnet (fl-74-4-223-93.dhcp.embarqhsd.net [74.4.223.93]) (Authenticated sender: luke-jr) by zinan.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8612456054C; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 13:30:08 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke-Jr" To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 09:29:54 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/2.6.39-gentoo; KDE/4.6.2; x86_64; ; ) References: <20110617103124.GA7177@ulyssis.org> In-Reply-To: <20110617103124.GA7177@ulyssis.org> X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: CE5A D56A 36CC 69FA E7D2 3558 665F C11D D53E 9583 X-PGP-Key-ID: 665FC11DD53E9583 X-PGP-Keyserver: x-hkp://subkeys.pgp.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201106170929.57750.luke@dashjr.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Headers-End: 1QXZ7m-0007xD-3F Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Roadmap for autotools / Qt gui merge X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 13:30:19 -0000 On Friday, June 17, 2011 6:31:25 AM Pieter Wuille wrote: > The only disadvantage of another GUI is that the (necessary) cleanup of > RPC/GUI code will now need makes changes in 3 places instead of 2, but as > I understand it, there are much more people willing to work on Qt code > than on wx code? I'm not sure the Wallet protocol implementation needs to touch the GUI code at all, except when porting the GUI to use it. Therefore, if the code is already written, I don't see any harm in merging it.