Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Rmu17-0005lt-QH for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 21:23:01 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 74.125.82.53 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.53; envelope-from=gavinandresen@gmail.com; helo=mail-ww0-f53.google.com; Received: from mail-ww0-f53.google.com ([74.125.82.53]) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1Rmu16-0003qu-Rn for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 21:23:01 +0000 Received: by wgbds1 with SMTP id ds1so1166489wgb.10 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 13:22:54 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.95.131 with SMTP id dk3mr12042215wib.6.1326748974786; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 13:22:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.63.212 with HTTP; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 13:22:54 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 16:22:54 -0500 Message-ID: From: Gavin Andresen To: Ben Reeves Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0444ee7359295304b6abd157 X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (gavinandresen[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1Rmu16-0003qu-Rn Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP Submission X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 21:23:01 -0000 --f46d0444ee7359295304b6abd157 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Your approach won't work-- OP_ADD is limited to 4-byte operands. Changing that would require a "hard" blockchain split / entire-network-upgrade. I wish to submit the following draft BIP for discussion and possible > formal BIP review. > > https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/BIP_M_of_2_DRAFT > > It is a proposed alternative to BIP 16 ("/P2SH/"). > > Thank you, > Ben Reeves > -- -- Gavin Andresen --f46d0444ee7359295304b6abd157 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Your approach won't work-- OP_ADD is limited to 4-byte operands. =A0Cha= nging that would require a "hard" blockchain split / entire-netwo= rk-upgrade.

h= ttps://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/BIP_M_of_2_DRAFT

It is a proposed alternative to BIP 16 ("/P2SH/").

Thank you,
Ben Reeves
=A0
--
--
Gavin Andresen<= br>
--f46d0444ee7359295304b6abd157--