Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of bitpay.com
	designates 74.125.82.172 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=74.125.82.172; envelope-from=jgarzik@bitpay.com;
	helo=mail-we0-f172.google.com; 
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20140519144709.GA29574@netbook.cypherspace.org>
References: <BAY173-W1475F72C70BC089A82C20FCC300@phx.gbl>
	<5377892C.8080402@gmail.com>
	<CAAS2fgS-Ewj3T0-d=h7ET9dCz3+NPPYVOLDWd7T7oYY95x-sUA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALDj+Bbsb6JiLabTBx21k02dDvnmZZDCXmJ2mnh7DngBon202w@mail.gmail.com>
	<5379FF38.4050909@certimix.com>
	<20140519144709.GA29574@netbook.cypherspace.org>
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@bitpay.com>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 06:30:37 -0400
Message-ID: <CAJHLa0P8iuh3atbh8hwGaW24qb3JhGBBRyHZObuU0bGGWLVVXg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Adam Back <adam@cypherspace.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] patents...
Precedence: list

On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Adam Back <adam@cypherspace.org> wrote:
> hmm Yes and this topic now is more than a bit non dev related.  Sorry about
> that.  There seems to be no convenient mailing list format for non-dev stuff
> or I would Cc and set Reply-To for example?  (Web forums somewhat suck IMO).

There is the little-used "bitcoin-list" on SourceForge that claims a
rubric of "general discussion":
https://sourceforge.net/p/bitcoin/mailman/?source=navbar

I just subscribed there.

We can "reboot" that list with a couple new rules such as
a) be good to each other.  consistent rude behavior gets the boot.
b) anything related to decentralization, consensus, proven data
structures or crypto is on-topic

-- 
Jeff Garzik
Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelist
BitPay, Inc.      https://bitpay.com/