From: Matt Whitlock <bip@mattwhitlock.name>
To: Mark Friedenbach <mark@friedenbach.org>
Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2015 00:57:21 -0400
Message-ID: <1854821.ToCRAf8eXU@crushinator>
User-Agent: KMail/4.14.9 (Linux/4.0.5-gentoo; KDE/4.14.9; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <CAOG=w-swH-_cD00Xy5yCN7LebeQSh-oG0gXFM6LxNSDwQZ64Tw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAAUFj10D37A1kfqFNPWz6bOMYSFXQbecJ+RxxOnw6HtwUg70mg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAOG=w-swH-_cD00Xy5yCN7LebeQSh-oG0gXFM6LxNSDwQZ64Tw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] REQ BIP # / Discuss - Sweep incoming unconfirmed
	transactions with a bounty.
Precedence: list

PR#1647 only addresses miner policy, though, right? I believe the BIP is addressing the user-facing side of this functionality. CPFP mining policy does very little good if wallets don't offer any way for users to goose up incoming transactions.


On Wednesday, 1 July 2015, at 9:52 pm, Mark Friedenbach wrote:
> This is called child pays for parent and there is a three year old pull
> request implementing it:
> 
> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/1647
> 
> The points regarding sweep transaction UI is out of scope for a BIP I'm
> afraid. I suggest talking with wallet authors, and if agreement can be
> found writing a pull request.
> On Jul 1, 2015 9:44 PM, "Dan Bryant" <dkbryant@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > This is a process BIP request to add functionality to the Bitcoin-Core
> > reference implementation.  If accepted, this could also add
> > flexibility into any future fee schedules.
> >
> > https://github.com/d4n13/bips/blob/master/bip-00nn.mediawiki