Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1R5gHn-0004m4-Ed for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 16:01:35 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of lavabit.com designates 72.249.41.33 as permitted sender) client-ip=72.249.41.33; envelope-from=bgroff@lavabit.com; helo=karen.lavabit.com; Received: from karen.lavabit.com ([72.249.41.33]) by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) id 1R5gHh-00068m-QE for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 16:01:35 +0000 Received: from a.earth.lavabit.com (a.earth.lavabit.com [192.168.111.10]) by karen.lavabit.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B75D11BC07; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 11:01:24 -0500 (CDT) Received: from lavabit.com (anonymizer2.blutmagie.de [192.251.226.206]) by lavabit.com with ESMTP id CA92GZNP7H9S; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 11:01:24 -0500 Received: from 192.251.226.206 (SquirrelMail authenticated user bgroff) by lavabit.com with HTTP; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 12:01:24 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <21269.192.251.226.206.1316448084.squirrel@lavabit.com> In-Reply-To: References: <201109182104.45994.luke@dashjr.org> Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 12:01:24 -0400 (EDT) From: bgroff@lavabit.com To: "Alex Waters" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.13 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.5 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid X-Headers-End: 1R5gHh-00068m-QE Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin Enhancement Proposals (BEPS) X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 16:01:35 -0000 > http://www.python.org/dev/peps/ is a good reference if you're > interested in seeing how PEPs work in action. I would be more than > willing to maintain a similar index if that's what people want. Would the multi-signature proposal be a good test case for BEP-0002? https://gist.github.com/dba89537d352d591eb36 I can reformat it and email here. Gavin has a competing one: https://gist.github.com/39158239e36f6af69d6f and I have a pull request matching a previous version of my proposal. -- Bobby Groff