Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="Apple-Mail=_83D4F970-123A-4C36-8F65-15E659ABCFDD"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
From: Peter R <peter_r@gmx.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKfs=Z-NuTrsSsLjPLFDatM9ye3_FLW=-hDrhQjO+biRvt=buw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 22:33:43 -0700
Message-Id: <0682C961-08D4-4855-972C-F39464F7A9DA@gmx.com>
References: <CAKzdR-rPoByn=+CgsTc1ZnLkjwtYyJnbQLbn-VHOvz0dLciefQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<1489086.kGfJeeyi4a@garp>
	<CAAS2fgSyWaRfXHKWZYzZ4X8ksMECaO47dTXum67XwpTTYnbDXg@mail.gmail.com>
	<2081461.sDX5ARzIdv@garp>
	<CAAS2fgSsJ10P7YYAAsV4P6no3pC=WYozWuN64u=WLSB3h6cHwA@mail.gmail.com>
	<561325D4.5030800@thinlink.com>
	<8EF9A9A8-3EBE-4427-9745-1C494DF12E9A@gmx.com>
	<CAKfs=Z-NuTrsSsLjPLFDatM9ye3_FLW=-hDrhQjO+biRvt=buw@mail.gmail.com>
To: NotMike Hearn <not.mike.hearn@gmail.com>
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] This thread is not about the soft/hard fork
	technical debate
Precedence: list


--Apple-Mail=_83D4F970-123A-4C36-8F65-15E659ABCFDD
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=utf-8


> If we want decentralization (or even mere stability), we must impose a =
counterbalancing rule such that each past commit makes one *less* likely =
to get their next commit pulled. For example, a "one man one commit" =
policy.

Haha great stuff, NotMike!

Indeed, it=E2=80=99s not enough to keep the block size limit small so =
that every man can run his own node, we also must also implement your =
proposed =E2=80=9Cone man, one commit=E2=80=9D policy!  Think of the =
decentralization if everyone Bitcoin user is also contributing code!    =
/s

Peter


--Apple-Mail=_83D4F970-123A-4C36-8F65-15E659ABCFDD
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset=utf-8

<html><head><meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html =
charset=3Dutf-8"></head><body style=3D"word-wrap: break-word; =
-webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" =
class=3D""><div><br class=3D""></div><div><blockquote type=3D"cite" =
class=3D""><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D""><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div =
class=3D"gmail_quote"><div class=3D"">If we want decentralization (or =
even mere stability), we must impose a counterbalancing rule such that =
each past commit makes one *less* likely to get their next commit =
pulled. For example, a "one man one commit" policy.<br =
class=3D""></div></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br =
class=3D""></div><div>Haha great stuff, NotMike!</div><div><br =
class=3D""></div><div>Indeed, it=E2=80=99s not enough to keep the block =
size limit small so that every man can run his own node, we also must =
also implement your proposed =E2=80=9Cone man, one commit=E2=80=9D =
policy! &nbsp;Think of the decentralization if everyone Bitcoin user is =
also contributing code! &nbsp; &nbsp;/s</div><div><br =
class=3D""></div><div>Peter</div><div><br class=3D""></div><div><br =
class=3D""></div><blockquote type=3D"cite" class=3D""><div class=3D""><div=
 dir=3D"ltr" class=3D""><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div =
class=3D"gmail_quote"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" =
style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px =
0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left=
-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"></blockquote></div></div></div>
</div></blockquote></div><br class=3D""></body></html>=

--Apple-Mail=_83D4F970-123A-4C36-8F65-15E659ABCFDD--