Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1WOsxE-0008Vz-UB for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 15 Mar 2014 18:05:04 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of zikula.org designates 209.85.212.181 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.212.181; envelope-from=drak@zikula.org; helo=mail-wi0-f181.google.com; Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com ([209.85.212.181]) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1WOsxD-0002mE-To for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 15 Mar 2014 18:05:04 +0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f181.google.com with SMTP id hm4so714445wib.8 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2014 11:04:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=1xjCwHscX6mOK5EX5/uKINZYN4MuchcdKSn26iJhios=; b=c7fnR/jRmWX2E3WdHCRR/JHXQU9eA8ZeIOXZCmzsluYcRhfgu/91yZinL6swXINqG9 5qVtH2r0iI/Q63z+rAGolNXCJD31EyRtCK+9g54nxz2XoX646bHcyltcpuAEojcCl864 p4je6sqtavDp3ldwNGc6wqh876phWCI6Oq1WXtDTpn+EQXlKzo/jcw7I3Pag/7B6jsdx ef8je1g4vMEdUwGfJiU3SNrMhW9QIgV07ylwZODgO7MB4sgBN5F3rH/bSeaMWc+nPFWj JPfzSJDKgQfrKqxrdcTZ+Fe+2DDLsa71fDrkAHC1OYsbXNAENx1TXLfBlxCtcYFJU/jm DrLg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn+0aJd9wtGftun/slhURZWgaA6OG9IVc3S+yAskNkfXBpJpNCoMwDhlm8pq7JTachWGgZ8 X-Received: by 10.180.73.1 with SMTP id h1mr3266142wiv.10.1394906697628; Sat, 15 Mar 2014 11:04:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.205.69 with HTTP; Sat, 15 Mar 2014 11:04:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20140315172254.GA18318@savin> References: <20140315134340.GA12937@savin> <20140315172254.GA18318@savin> From: Drak Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 18:04:37 +0000 Message-ID: To: Peter Todd Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0434c0b83512f704f4a9063c X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Headers-End: 1WOsxD-0002mE-To Cc: Bitcoin Dev , Andy Weidenbaum , Alex Mizrahi Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] python-bitcoinlib v0.1 release - a low-level Python2/3 interface to the Bitcoin protocol X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 18:05:05 -0000 --f46d0434c0b83512f704f4a9063c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Yes. I think the problem is your fork has been under more development and upstream has stalled. The problem with this is it becomes unclear which repo is the main one as it really has become a fork and of course then development really does fork properly which is a shame because it doesn't nurture community contributions around the project which is really important. Drak On 15 March 2014 17:22, Peter Todd wrote: > On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 05:12:42PM +0000, Drak wrote: > > Would it make sense to pull that stuff in and add Peter with commit > access > > since your repo is top of the fork tree. > > I've noticed it looks like people actually using my 'pythonize' code > have been linking directly to my tree in things like documentation and > build scripts, so the URL is probably not a problem. > > I did open a pull-req on the bitcoin.org repo to change that URL > however: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin.org/pull/346 > > -- > 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org > 0000000000000000ef4a047ecc7077b7855626b9c9bf07e528e0c6ace2da30a8 > --f46d0434c0b83512f704f4a9063c Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Yes. I think the problem is your fork has been under more = development and upstream has stalled. The problem with this is it becomes u= nclear which repo is the main one as it really has become a fork and of cou= rse then development really does fork properly which is a shame because it = doesn't nurture community contributions around the project which is rea= lly important.

Drak



On 15 March 2014 17:22, Pet= er Todd <pete@petertodd.org> wrote:
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 05:1= 2:42PM +0000, Drak wrote:
> Would it make sense to pull that stuff in and add Peter with commit ac= cess
> since your repo is top of the fork tree.

I've noticed it looks like people actually using my 'pythoniz= e' code
have been linking directly to my tree in things like documentation and
build scripts, so the URL is probably not a problem.

I did open a pull-req on the bitcoin.org repo to change that URL
however: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin.org/pull/346

--
'peter'[:-1]@pet= ertodd.org
0000000000000000ef4a047ecc7077b7855626b9c9bf07e528e0c6ace2da30a8

--f46d0434c0b83512f704f4a9063c--